Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Smyth (Ross T.) & Company Ltd v T. D. Bailey, Son & Company

Cited authorities 10 Cited in 157 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1940
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
142 cases
  • Toepfer (Alfred C.) v Cremer
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 March 1975
    ...it. There is an emphatic statement of the principle by which the fact of repudiation is to be determined in Lord Wright's speech in Smyth v. Bailey (1940) 3 All E. R. 60 at page 72; it fully coversthe situation of the buyers In this case. 86 Mr. Lloyd's second point was that by appointing a......
  • Banning v Wright
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 June 1972
    ...25 My Lords, I cannot myself attach this limited meaning to the expression "waiver". In Ross T. Smyth & Co. Ltd. v. Bailey, Son & Co. [1940] 3 All E.R. 60 at p. 70] Lord Wright discussed the ordinary meaning of the term, which as my noble and learned friend, Lord Simon of Glaisdale, pointed......
  • Hindley & Company Ltd v East Indian Produce Company Ltd (Peramataris)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • American Life Insurance Company v Sumintra
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
    • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Cases referred to in 1983
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1983 Preliminary Sections
    • 22 November 2022
    ...Series) 162 at 167. 161 Smith v. Great Western Railway (1877) 3 App. Cas. 166 229 Smyth (Ross. T) & Co. Ltd. v. Bailey, Sons & Co. (1940) 3 All E.R. 60 at 7 2 Smythe v. Wiles 1921 - 2 K B 66 2 Sobanjo v. Oke and Anor. (1954) 14 W.A.C.A. 593. 44 Sockna Momodu Allie & Ors. v. Alhadi (1952) 13......
  • Waiver of the right to judicial impartiality : comparative analysis of South African and Commonwealth jurisprudence
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 28-1, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...his rights, the onus of proving waiver is strictly on the party19Per Lord Wright in Smyth (Ross T) and Co Ltd v Bailey, Sons and Co [1940] 3 All ER 60 at 67.121989 167 CLR 568.13Id 588.14Per Idigbe JSC, Ariori v Elemo (1984) 5 NCLR 1 at 18.15Aro v Fabolude (1983) 1 SCNLR 58.16As Lord Philli......
  • ARIORI & ORS. V. ELEMO & ORS.
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Nigerian Supreme Court Cases. 1983 Cases reported in 1983
    • 22 November 2022
    ...v. Test (1922) 65 Mont. 134 35 9. Vyvyan v. Vyvyan 30 Bear 65 at 74; 54 E.R. 817 10.Smyth (Ross. T) & Co. Ltd. v. Bailey, Sons & Co. (1940) 3 All E.R. 60 at 7. 11. Smythe v. Wiles 1921 - 2 K.B. 66 12. Papadopoulos v. Padopoulos 1929 31 Probate Division 55. 13.Oshodi v. Balogun 4 W.A.C.A. 40......
  • DEMYSTIFYING THE RIGHT OF ELECTION IN CONTRACT LAW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...majeure notices, the gist of the dicta by Robert Goff J at 67 was about equitable estoppel although the word “waiver” was used. 95 (1940) 164 LT 102 at 106. 96 [1971] AC 850 at 882—883. 97 Supra n 30, at 28—29. 98 (1990) 170 CLR 394. 99 Ibid, at 406. 100 See quote from Lord Goff’s judgment ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT