Smyth (Ross T.) & Company Ltd v T. D. Bailey, Son & Company
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Year | 1940 |
| Date | 1940 |
| Court | House of Lords |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
142 cases
-
Banning v Wright
...I cannot myself attach this limited meaning to the expression "waiver". In Ross T. Smyth & Co. Ltd. v. Bailey, Son & Co. [1940] 3 All E.R. 60 at p. 70] Lord Wright discussed the ordinary meaning of the term, which as my noble and learned friend, Lord Simon of Glaisdale, pointed out ......
-
Toepfer (Alfred C.) v Cremer
... ... , will not justify a charge of repudiation, see Ross Smith v. Bailey (1940) 56 T. L. R. at page 830 by Lord ... is to be determined in Lord Wright's speech in Smyth v. Bailey (1940) 3 All E. R. 60 at page 72 ; it fully ... ...
- Hindley & Company Ltd v East Indian Produce Company Ltd (Peramataris)
- American Life Insurance Company v Sumintra
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Cases referred to in 1983
...Series) 162 at 167. 161 Smith v. Great Western Railway (1877) 3 App. Cas. 166 229 Smyth (Ross. T) & Co. Ltd. v. Bailey, Sons & Co. (1940) 3 All E.R. 60 at 7 2 Smythe v. Wiles 1921 - 2 K B 66 2 Sobanjo v. Oke and Anor. (1954) 14 W.A.C.A. 593. 44 Sockna Momodu Allie & Ors. v. Alhadi (1952) 13......
-
Waiver of the right to judicial impartiality : comparative analysis of South African and Commonwealth jurisprudence
...his rights, the onus of proving waiver is strictly on the party19Per Lord Wright in Smyth (Ross T) and Co Ltd v Bailey, Sons and Co [1940] 3 All ER 60 at 67.121989 167 CLR 568.13Id 588.14Per Idigbe JSC, Ariori v Elemo (1984) 5 NCLR 1 at 18.15Aro v Fabolude (1983) 1 SCNLR 58.16As Lord Philli......
-
ARIORI & ORS. V. ELEMO & ORS.
...v. Test (1922) 65 Mont. 134 35 9. Vyvyan v. Vyvyan 30 Bear 65 at 74; 54 E.R. 817 10.Smyth (Ross. T) & Co. Ltd. v. Bailey, Sons & Co. (1940) 3 All E.R. 60 at 7. 11. Smythe v. Wiles 1921 - 2 K.B. 66 12. Papadopoulos v. Padopoulos 1929 31 Probate Division 55. 13.Oshodi v. Balogun 4 W.A.C.A. 40......
-
DEMYSTIFYING THE RIGHT OF ELECTION IN CONTRACT LAW
...majeure notices, the gist of the dicta by Robert Goff J at 67 was about equitable estoppel although the word “waiver” was used. 95 (1940) 164 LT 102 at 106. 96 [1971] AC 850 at 882—883. 97 Supra n 30, at 28—29. 98 (1990) 170 CLR 394. 99 Ibid, at 406. 100 See quote from Lord Goff’s judgment ......