Société Commerciale de Réassurance v Eras International Ltd (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
| Judgment Date | 1995 |
| Year | 1995 |
| Date | 1995 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
12 cases
-
Compagnie Commercial Andre S.a. V. Artibell Shipping Company Limited And The Governor And Company Of The Bank Of Scotland
...of Justice for a preliminary ruling. At a later stage in the debate, Mr Kinroy very properly added reference to The Eras EIL Actions [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 64. In that case an interlocutory application was made by originating summonses to restrain the plaintiffs in the actions from bringing o......
-
Masri v Consolidated Contractors International UK Ltd and Others (No. 2)
...subject to an implicit liberty to apply and to discharge if the foreign proceedings contemplated cease to be oppressive: Eras EIL Actions [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 64. 21 The English court did not assume jurisdiction on a false basis. The claim against CCUK was arguable at the time that jurisdic......
-
Tyson International Company Ltd v GIC Re, India, Corporate Member Ltd
...issue whether there is a binding exclusive jurisdiction agreement in favour of the English Courts. Thus: (1) In The Eras Eil Actions [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 64 at 74, Potter J said: “in a case where an anti-suit injunction is applied for in relation to proceedings in which the issue sought to......
-
Glencore International AG v Exter Shipping Ltd
...in the judge's approach, as I have understood it, and it appears to be supported by the judgment of Potter J in The Eras Eil Actions [1995] 1 Lloyd's Rep 64 at 74. Section 37(1) of the Supreme Court Act 1981 61 As stated above, it is common ground that this is nowadays the source of power ......
Get Started for Free
