Society of Lloyd's v Leighs

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
JudgeSaville,Ward,Phillips L JJ
Judgment Date31 July 1997
Date31 July 1997
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Court of Appeal

Before Lord Justice Saville, Lord Justice Ward and Lord Justice Phillips

Society of Lloyd's
and
Lyon Same v Leighs Same v Wilkinson

Lloyd's litigation - names rejecting renewal plan - names still liable to pay premiums

Names who reject Lloyd's renewal plan still liable for premiums

Lloyd's names who rejected the reconstruction and renewal plan by Lloyd's for the voluntary global settlement of claims in respect of business written in or before 1992 were, nevertheless, liable to pay premiums pursuant to a reinsurance and run-off contract concluded as part of that plan.

The Court of Appeal so held in a reserved judgment dismissing the appeals of the defendant names, Geoffrey Lyon, Dennis Leighs and David Wilkinson, against decisions of Mr Justice Colman in the Commercial Court of the Queen's Bench Division on February 20 and April 24 giving summary judgment for the plaintiffs, the Society of Lloyd's, and declaring that the names were liable to pay premiums pursuant to a reinsurance and run-off contract concluded as part of the society's reconstruction and renewal plan which the names had rejected.

215 Canadian names, who had also rejected the plan, intervened in the actions, which were test cases.

Mr Simon Goldblatt, QC and Mr Vincent Nelson for the names; Mr Anthony Grabiner, QC, Mr Richard Jacobs and Mr David Foxton for Lloyd's; Mr Alan

Lenczner, QC of the Ontario Bar, and Mr Craig Orr for the Canadian names.

LORD JUSTICE SAVILLE, giving the judgment of the court, said that the appeals raised fundamental questions as to the efficacy of the complex scheme under which the Society of Lloyd's had set out to resolve the avalanche of litigation that had been threatening to destroy the Lloyd's market and many who traded in it.

That scheme, the reconstruction and renewal plan, involved a voluntary global settlement of claims of various descriptions made by and against names in respect of business written in or before 1992 coupled with a reinsurance and run-off contract, in the nature of a global reinsurance to close, with a group of companies formed specifically for that purpose: the Equitas contract.

Lloyd's had purported to procure that all names with actual or potential liabilities in respect of non-life business written in or before 1992 were party to the Equitas contract.

If Lloyd's had succeeded in that, names who had declined to take part in the reconstruction and renewal settlement were, none the less, liable to pay premiums for the reinsurance cover provided by Equitas. Equitas had assigned the right to such premiums to the society.

The Equitas contract

Each of the names had entered into a standard form agreement with the society, the general undertaking, which included an undertaking by the name to comply with the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
  • John Reilly (Claimant/Appellant) v National Insurance and Guarantee Corporation Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 19 December 2008
    ... ... in Absalom v TCRU Ltd [2005] EWCA Civ 1586 , [2006] 2 Lloyds Rep 129 , the speech of Lord Diplock in Antaios Compania Naviera v Salen Rederierna AB [1985] ... ...
  • Society of Lloyd's v Surman [ChD]
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 13 October 2004
    ...who had not assented to the R & R Settlement were nevertheless liable to pay premiums for the reinsurance provided by Equitas: The Society of Lloyd's v. Leighs [1997] CLC 759 and 1012. 12 The Court of Appeal dismissed appeals from his decision: The Society of Lloyd's v. Leighs [1997] CLC 13......
  • The Names at Lloyd's for the 1992 and Prior Years of Account, Represented by Equitas Ltd Equitas Insurance Ltd (formerly Known as Speyford Ltd) Part vii of The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 7 July 2009
    ... ... Robin Knowles CBE QC (instructed by Lloyd's Legal Department ) for the Society of Lloyd's ... Christopher Symons QC and Robert Purves (instructed by FSA General ... The basis and rationale of Lloyd's R&R is more fully described in Society of Lloyd's v Leighs & ors [1997] CLC 759 ... 4 The reinsurance to close was achieved on ... ...
  • WRM Group Ltd v Wood
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 November 1997
    ...v HeathENR (1813) 3 Camp 506; 170 ER 1462. Skipskredittforeningen v Emperor Navigation [1997] CLC 1151. Society of Lloyd's v Leighs [1997] CLC 1398. Contract — Breach — Misrepresentation — Set-off — Purchase price for companies satisfied in part by issue by purchaser of loan notes to seller......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT