Socony Mobil Oil Company Inc. v West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association (London) Ltd (No 2) (Padre Island)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1988 |
| Date | 1988 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 cases
- Montedipe S.p.A. v JTP-RO Jugotanker (Jordan Nicolov)
-
West Tankers Inc. v Ras Riunione Adriatica Di Sicurta Spa and Others
... ... Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL ... Mr Timothy Brenton QC ... with their claim against the claimant Owners of the Front Comor before the Tribunale di ... the Court of Appeal in Through Transport Mutual Insurance Association (Eurasia) Ltd v. New India ... contractual rights which the insurance company is seeking to enforce in Brazil is English law." ... from the judgment of Lord Goff in The Padre Island (No.2) [1990] 2 Lloyd's Rep 191 at ... would be referred to arbitration in England. The English Court would not be offended if a ... ...
-
The General Trading Company (Holdings) Ltd v Richmond Corporation Ltd
...approach these statements with caution in the light of Bingham LJ's observation in The”Fanti” and the “Padre Island” (No. 2) [1989] 1 Lloyd's Rep 239, 255 that he doubted that what was said in the Gilbert Ash case on this issue was part of the ratio because no authority on penalty clauses ......
-
Centre Reinsurance International Company v Freakley
...rights of the parties in a winding up, and so could not be given effect. But, in Socony Mobil Oil Co Inc and others v West of England Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association Ltd (the “Padre Island”) (No 2) [1987] 2 Lloyd's Rep 529, Mr Justice Saville took the opposite view. The two cases ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Limitation of action considerations in respect of U.K. insurers.
...insurance, reinsurance and energy-related issues, as well as business litigation and arbitration. (1.) [1985] 1 A11 E.R. 243. (2.) [1989] 1 Lloyd's Rep 239, overruled [1990] 2 A11 E.R. 705 (H.L.) on separate point. (3.) [1963] 2 Lloyd's Rep 65. (4.) See Amantilla v. Telefusion, [1987] 9 Con......