Southwark Water Company v Quick
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1877 |
| Date | 1877 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
49 cases
- Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v International Litigation Funding Partners Pte Ltd (No 2)
- Brooks v Medical Defence Association of Western Australia
-
Three Rivers District Council and Others v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 9)
...their legal advice, that any privilege should be extended to communications such as these." Here Cotton LJ, unlike in his judgment in Southwark v Quick, considers each of the two categories of legal professional privilege and decides in terms that the documents in question do not fall withi......
- Ankin v London and North Eastern Railway Company
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Legal professional privilege in corporate criminal investigations
...at para. 52.8. See, in particular, Anderson v Bank of British Columbia (1876) 2 ch. D 644; Southwark and Vauxhall Water Co v Quick (1878) 3 QBD 315; Wheeler v Le Marchant (1881) 17 ch. D 675. The early cases did not adopt the ‘legal advice privilege’/‘litigationprivilege’ terminological dic......
-
Case Note: EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF LEGAL ADVICE PRIVILEGE1
...(No 6)[2005] AC 610 at [96] referring to Anderson v Bank of British Columbia(1876) 2 Ch D 644, Southwark and Vauxhall Water Co v Quick(1878) 3 QBD 315, and Wheeler v Le Marchant(1881) 17 Ch D 675 as the origin for this branch of the privilege. Section 131 is in fact just the flip side of s ......