Southwark Water Company v Quick

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1877
Date1877

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • Three Rivers District Council and Others v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No. 9)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 March 2004
    ...their legal advice, that any privilege should be extended to communications such as these." Here Cotton LJ, unlike in his judgment in Southwark v Quick, considers each of the two categories of legal professional privilege and decides in terms that the documents in question do not fall withi......
  • Ankin v London and North Eastern Railway Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 30 May 2003
    ...to. (39) Say & Seal (Lord)”s CaseENR(1712), 10 Mod. 41; 88 E.R. 617, referred to. (40) Southwark & Vauxhall Water Co. v. QuickELR(1878), 3 Q.B.D. 315, dicta of Cockburn, C.J. considered. (41) Telesystem Intl. Wireless Inc. v. CVC/Opportunity Equity Partners L.P., 2001 CILR 444, dicta of San......
  • Waugh v British Railways Board
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 509 ; [ 1959 ] 2 All E.R. 15 ... Southwark and Vauxhall Water Co. v. Quick ( 1878 ) 3 Q.B.D. 315 , C.A ... reports are made on a form headed: ‘For the information of the company's solicitors only,’ which is a very important heading to have, because ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Legal professional privilege in corporate criminal investigations
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 82-4, August 2018
    • 1 August 2018
    ...at para. 52.8. See, in particular, Anderson v Bank of British Columbia (1876) 2 ch. D 644; Southwark and Vauxhall Water Co v Quick (1878) 3 QBD 315; Wheeler v Le Marchant (1881) 17 ch. D 675. The early cases did not adopt the ‘legal advice privilege’/‘litigationprivilege’ terminological dic......