Spar Shipping as v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2015 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Fulton Shipping Inc. of Panama (Respondents/Owners) v Globalia Business Travel S.A.U. (Formerly Travelplan S.A.U.) (Appellants/Charterers)
...(as well as from the later decision of Popplewell J himself in Spar Shipping A/S v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Co Ltd [2015] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 407 paras 221–226) that compensation for actual loss is the underlying principle and that, in this connection, it is the available market rul......
-
SK Shipping Europe Plc v Capital VLCC 3 Corporation
...are willing to take for that period ( Spar Shipping AS v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Co Ltd [2015] EWHC 718 (Comm); [2015] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 407, [221–222]). For that reason, I do not feel able to place reliance on the significantly shorter charters (3 to 6 months) referred to by M......
-
Zymurgorium Ltd v Hammonds of Knutsford Plc
...E. Repudiation/Renunciation 37 In Spar Shipping AS v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Co Ltd [2015] EWHC 718 (Comm), [2015] 2 Lloyd's Rep 407, Popplewell J, as he then was summarised the principles in relation to repudiation and renunciation and the relationship between the two: “208......
-
Cssa Chartering and Shipping Services S.A v Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd "Pacific Voyager"
...the kind I sought to identify in paragraph 208(3) and (4) of my judgment in Spar Shipping AS v Grand China Logistics Holding Co Ltd [2015] 2 Lloyd's Rep 407. The difficulty in the way of this argument is that if, which is the stated hypothesis, the Owners were not in breach of any express o......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Decision In Spar Shipping Handed Down
...a condition. It was soon followed by another first instance decision on the same point, that of Popplewell J in Spar Shipping [2015] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 407. Popplewell J held that the obligation is not a condition, but an innominate term, meaning that a shipowner is only entitled to claim damag......
-
The 'NEW FLAMENCO'
...to claim damages based on his actual loss, taking into account his actual mitigating actions. The Court also mentioned Spar Shipping [2015] 2 Lloyd's Rep 407 to point out that 'compensation for actual loss is the underlying In the light of these decisions, the Court of Appeal concluded that......