Sparks v Cole
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1704 |
| Date | 01 January 1704 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 125 E.R. 702
Common Pleas Division
702 SCIRE FACIAS 2 LUTWYCHE,1268. Regni sui tricesimo sexto coram Thoma Jones Mil' & sociis suis tune Justili ejusdem Cur' hic scil't spud Westal p con' ejusdem Cur' recuperavit terminum sua de tribus mesuagiis cum ptifi in paroch Sei Egidii in Campis in Coiii edict' versus Humfridum Weld nuper de London Ar' qd' Will'us Atwood primo die Januarii Anne Regui dicti Duper Regis tricesimo quinto EdrO dimisit bend' & occupand' sibi & assign Buis a vicesimo quinto die Decembris tune ult' Pterit' usque fluent & terminura quinq, annorum extune px. sequefi & planar' compleud' & fiuiend' qui uoudum pteriit Et undo predict' Humfridus ipsum Edruiti a possessions sua nude expulit & amovit & eundem Edruai a firma sua edict' ejecit quatu undecim Libras quo end' Edrel in eadem Cur' predict' nuper Regis adjudicat' fuer' p dampnis suis que huit ()came premises undo convict' est grout p record' & process inde in Cur' Regis nunc hic residers liquet manifests Executio tamer Judicii predict' adbuc restat faciend' ac predictus Humfridus mortuns est Ac quidam Nichus Comes Carlingford & Maria uxor ejus in mesuagiis pdici cum ptiii mode ingressi stint & tenent contra formiic reeuperationis pdici put ex insinuatione ipsius Earn accepei at Rex Et quia &c. qd' p pbos &c. Sell' faceret pfai Nichum Comitem Carlingford & Mariam Lucer ejus qd' essent hic ad hunc diem scil't a die Sei Martini in quindecim dies ostens si quid &c. quare pdictus Edrug executionem versus eos de Termino pdiei adbuc futur' bore non deberet juxta forruam recuperationis pdici si &e. Et modo hic ad hunc die veil tam predictus Edrui p Thoma, Tooke Attorfi sua gin pdici Nichus Coin Carlingford & Maria uxor pinuttii &c. p Johanne Ellis Attorii suu Vic mode mama' qd' ipso virtute brevis sibi direci Scir' fecit prefal Coal & Mariam essendi hic ad hum diem p Georgia Howard & Johatitre" Meachin probes &c. Et super hoc idem Ed-[1268]-iris psi executionem versus prefat' Comit & uxor' de Termino pred' adbuc futur' sibi adjudicari &c. Et predici Nichus Comes Carlingford & Maria dicunt qd' predict' Breve de Seire fat mode & forma predict' e Cur' hic impetrat' & psequnt,' ac materia in eadem content' minus sufficient' in lege existunt ad predict' Edruai ad executionem suit' versus Dos de Termino predict' modo futur' bend' Qdq, ipei fide Nichus & Maria ad Breve de Seire fat modo & & forma predict' fact' Decease non bent nec per legem terre tenentur aliquo modo responder Et hoc past' aunt verificare undo petunt Judicium de eodem Brevi & qd' Breve ill' cassetur &c. Et predictus Edru-s' die qd' p aliqua p predict' Comit' & uxor' superius pl'itand' allegat' Breve de Seire fae ipsius Edli cassari non debet quia die quod Breve illud materiaq, in eodem content' boil & sufficien in lege existunt ad predict' Comit' & uxor' ad Breve illud respondere compellend' quod quidetu Breve materiaq, in eodem content' idea' Edru; past' est verificare Et quia predict' Comes & uxor ad Breve illud nom respond' nec ill' hucusque aliqualit' dedie idem Edr6 pet' Judicium & Executionem versus prefat' Comit' & uxor' de Termino predict' adbuc futur' sibi adjudicari &o. Et quia Justie hie se advisare volunt de & super premissis Judie inde reddant dies dal,' est partibus predict' hic usque de audiend' Judicio suo eo quod iidem Justie hic inde nondum &c. Judgment pro Quer' accordant al Case de Cole versus les Tertenants de Skinner, 1 Sid. 317. & issint fuit adjudge sur Demurrer enter Jackson & Torre & al', Hill. 11 W. 3 Regis, 3 Levinz 100. Cooke's Case, lou en Scire fac' vers les Executors de cestny versus quern Judgment en Ejectment fuit done, & un Estranger que ad enter en lee Terres, fuit adjudge qua gist. [1269] SPARKS Per,. COLE. Winford. Mich. 3 Jacobi 2. Regis. Rot. 324. Midd' BP. PreZ-: fuit ViC7eurn Sabian Cole de Bishopsgate-street London Mercator nuper in Cui' Mai Regis hic scil't Termino Si.5e Tiinitatis Anuo Regui dicti Dom Regis runic secundo coram Heurico...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pitt v Knight
...(a) (1) This seems misprinted for "Appeals in Robbery, 5." See East, Ent. 54 b. * East. 123 b. t Ibid. 169 b. \ Ibid, 194 b. (2) See 2 Lutw. 1269, 1273, Sparks v. Cole. 945, Rowel v. Dyon. Lib. Plac. 286. Though the Court seemed first to be of opinion, that no issue was joined, yet by affir......