Sparks v Restal

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date24 February 1857
Date24 February 1857
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 53 E.R. 341

ROLLS COURT

Sparks
and
Restal

[218] sparks v. bestal. Feb. 24, 1857. Bequeat to A. lor life, and after her death, to B. and C. " or " their children. B. and C. survived A. Held, that their children took nothing. Bequest to A. for life, and in case he should die without child or children, then to B. Held, that tie children took nothing by implication. The testator bequeathed to his daughter, Ann Sparks, an annuity of 20 during her natural life, and from and after her decease he gave " the said annuity or the value unto Ann Sparks (the daughter) and Matthias Sparks, or their child or children, lawfully begotten, share and share alike." Ann Sparks, the daughter, and Matthias Sparks, survived Ann Sparks, the tenant for life; and the first question was, whether their children took any interest in the annuity. The testator also bequeathed to his son, William Eestal, an annuity of 25 a year during his natural life, " and in ease his said son William should die without child or children, lawfully begotten, and from and after his decease," that being the case, he gave "the said annuity or value unto Ann and Matthias Sparks, and their child or children, lawfully begotten, share and share alike." 342 be brealy's settled estates 24 beav. 219. [219] The second question was, whether the children, if any, of William Restal took any interest in the annuity of 25. Mr. R. Palmer and Mr. G. Hastings, for the Plaintiff. The first gift to Ann Sparks, the daughter, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Blundell v Chapman
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 4 March 1864
    ...Petty (3 Hare, 86); Price v. Lockley (6 Beav. 180); WTiitcher v. Penley (9 Beav. 477); Penley v. Penley (12 Beav. 547); Sparks v. Sesttd (24 Beav. 218) ; Timins v. Stackhouse (27 Beav. 434). Mr. C. C, Barker, in reply. [651] the master of the bolls [Sir John Eomillyl. I will look into the c......
  • James v Shannon
    • Ireland
    • Rolls Court (Ireland)
    • 17 February 1868
    ...1 Russ. & M. 645. Ex parte RogersUNK 2 Mad. 449. Ranelagh v. RanelaghENR 12 Beav. 200. Lee v. Busk 2 D. M. & G. 812. Sparks v. BestalENR 24 Beav. 218. Kinsella v. CaffrayUNK 11 Ir. Ch. Rep. 154. Horton v. HortonENR Cr. Jac. 74. Attwater v. AttwaterENR 18 Beav. 330. Pickering v. Lord Stamfor......
  • Champ v Champ and Others
    • Ireland
    • Queen's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 1 February 1892
    ...Kinsella v. CaffreyUNK 11 Ir. Ch. Rep. 154. Neighbour v. ThurlowENR 28 Beav. 33. Ranelagh v. RanelaghENR 12 Beav. 200. Sparks v. RestalENR 24 Beav. 218. Green v. WardENR 1 Russ. 262. Gardner v. Sheldon Tud. L. Cas. 625. Hone's CaseENR Cro. Car. 366. Ranelagh v. RanelaghENR 12 Beav. 200. In ......
  • M'Clean v Simpson
    • Ireland
    • Chancery Division (Ireland)
    • 29 November 1887
    ...Kinsella v. Caffrey11 Ir. Ch. R. 154 see judgement of the Master of the Rolls, at p. 162. Lee v. Busk2 D. M. & G. 810. Sparks v. RestalENR24 Beav. 218. Will Constrruction Legacy Gift by implication " Die without leaviong children legally to inherit " Lapse. Y.-C. M'CLBAN SIMPSON. 1887. Nov.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT