Spence v Shell UK Ltd Spence and another v Shell UK Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1980
Date1980
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Tesco Stores Ltd v Costain Construction Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 2 July 2003
    ...be binding" (per Denning LJ at p.220, Birkett LJ at p.224 and Asquith LJ at p.225.); see also per Oliver LJ in Spence v. Shell UK Ltd. [1980] 2 EGLR 68, 73E. In Amalgamated Investment at p.107B, Robert Goff J touched on the same point, when distinguishing cases where parties had represented......
  • Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks & Spencer Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 February 2001
    ...v MacleanELR (1883) 11 QBD 327. Shearson Lehman Hutton Inc v Maclaine Watson & Co LtdUNK [1989] 2 Ll Rep 570. Spence v Shell UK LtdUNK [1980] 2 EGLR 68. Spiro v LinternWLR [1973] 1 WLR 1002. Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co LtdELR [1982] QB 133. Troop v GibsonUNK [1986]......
  • Baird Textile Holdings Ltd v Marks and Spencer Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 28 February 2001
    ...to be binding" (per Denning LJ at p.220, Birkett LJ at p.224 and Asquith LJ at p.225); see also per Oliver LJ in Spence v. Shell UK Ltd. [1980] 2 EGLR 68, 73E. In Amalgamated Investment at p. 107B, Robert Goff J touched on the same point, when distinguishing cases where parties had represen......
  • Mears Ltd v Shoreline Housing Partnership Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 20 May 2015
    ...to be binding" (per Denning LJ at p.220, Birkett LJ at p.224 and Asquith LJ at p.225); see also per Oliver LJ in Spence v. Shell UK Ltd. [1980] 2 EGLR 68, 73E. In Amalgamated Investment at p. 107B, Robert Goff J touched on the same point, when distinguishing cases where parties had represen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT