Spicer and Another v Smee

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1946
Date1946
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Gore v Stannard (trading as Wyvern Tyres)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 4 October 2012
    ...not be liable for negligence when the negligence is the negligence of a stranger. An action in nuisance 35 The modern example of this is Spicer v Smee [1946] 1 All E.R. 489 where the plaintiff's bungalow was completely destroyed by a fire which originated in the defendant's bungalow owing t......
  • LMS International Ltd and Others v Styrene Packaging and Insulation Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • 30 September 2005
    ...of the Act, because, in such circumstances, the relevant fire was not regarded as having been started accidentally: see Musgrove (supra); Spicer v Smee [1946] 1 ALL ER 489 and Perry v Kendricks Transport Limited [1956] 1 ALL ER 29 In Mason v Levy Auto Parts of England [1967] 2 QB 530, Ma......
  • Anthony and Others v The Coal Authority
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 28 July 2005
    ...nuisance arises out of a state of things on one man's property whereby his neighbour's property is exposed to danger", per Atkinson J in Spicer v. Smee [1946] All ER at page 393. The defendant, on the other hand, argues for a measured duty of care similar to that which was held by the Court......
  • Hollebone v Midhurst and Fernhurst Builders Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • The site
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...CJ. he owner may also be liable if the contractor leaves the premises in such a state as to make them prone to ire: Spicer v Smee [1946] 1 all Er 489; Johnson v BJW Property Developments Ltd (2002) 86 Con Lr 74; Lim Seng Chye v Pex International Pte Ltd [2019] SGhC 28 at [108]–[131], per Ma......
  • Tort Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...2nd Ed, 2016) at paras 10.094–10.097; Kenneth Cheong & Kenneth Yap, “An Overhaul of Nuisance” (1998) 19 Sing L Rev 309 at 317–318. 115 [1946] 1 All ER 489. 116 [2000] 2 SLR(R) 614. 117 Xpress Print Pte Ltd v Monocrafts Pte Ltd [2000] 2 SLR(R) 614 at [52]. 118 [1940] AC 880. 119 John Murphy,......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT