Stafford v The State (Note)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
53 cases
-
Narine Sooklal and Another v The State
...up on this rule when he was dealing with the case against Sooklal. The situation in this case is similar to that which arose in Stafford v. The State, (unreported), Privy Council Appeal No. 7 of 1998; 30th July 1998, which went to trial shortly after the jury's verdict in this case. Giselle......
-
Tido v R
...the principles that govern the application of the proviso is perhaps most conveniently to be found in the judgment of Lord Hope in Stafford v The State (Note) [1999] 1 WLR 2026 where he said at 2029: "The test which must be applied to the application of the proviso is whether, if the jury ......
-
Benjamin and Ganga v The State
...of the appellant, dismiss the appeal if they consider that no substantial miscarriage of justice has actually occurred." 52 In Stafford v The State (Note) [1999] 1 WLR 2026, 2029–2030 Lord Hope set out the principles that govern the application of the proviso: "The test which must be appli......
-
Black v R
...No. 45 applied R v Coutts [2006] 1 WLR 2154 considered R v Lucas [1981] Q.B. 720 applied R v Marr (1989) 90 Cr App R 154 considered Stafford v The State (Note) [1999] 1 WLR 2026 applied Stubbs et al v R SCCRApp Nos. 203 and 280 of 2013 and 106 and 208 of 2014 followed Teeluck v The Stat......
Request a trial to view additional results