Stag Line Ltd v Foscolo, Mango & Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 16 February 1931 |
| Date | 16 February 1931 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Manchikalapati & Others v Zurich Insurance Plc (t/a Zurich Building Guarantee & Zurich Municipal) and East West Insurance Company Ltd
...of the words used. But secondly, for the reasons pointed out in Thorman v Dowgate Steamship Co [1910] 1 KB 410 and Foscolo Mango and Co v Stag Line Limited [1931] 2 KB 48, a single species and general words may constitute a genus. This is further explained in Sir Kim Lewison's The Interpret......
-
Gunel Bakhshiyeva (in her Capacity as the Foreign Representative of the OJSC International Bank of Azerbaijan) v Sberbank of Russia
... ... or reconstruction from which it is hoped that the company will emerge as a going concern, the English court is likely ... by domestic precedents of antecedent date”: see Stag Line v Foscolo Mango & Co Limited [1932] AC 328 (“ ... ...
-
Sea Tank Shipping as (formerly known as Tank Invest as) v Vinnlustodin HF and another; The Aqasia
... ... As Lord Macmillan said in Stag Line v Foscolo, Mango & Co [1932] AC 328 at 350: ... in New Zealand Railways v Progressive Engineering Company Ltd [1968] NZLR 1053 had to consider the meaning of ... ...