Stamford, Spalding, and Boston Banking Company v Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1892 |
| Year | 1892 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Mohan Jogie v Angela Sealy
...being a precedent on materially identical facts. 154 Clark v Hooper was subsequently considered by the Court of Appeal in Stamford Spalding & Boston Banking Co v Smith [1892] 1 QB 765, where the question arose whether an acknowledgement or part payment of a debt made to someone other than ......
- Hipworth v Mahar
- Bowring-Hanbury's Trustee v Bowring-Hanbury
-
Grenfell v Girdlestone
...Grenfell and Girdlestone S.C. 7 L.J. Ex Eq. 42 Referred to, Godwin v. Culley, 1859, 4 H & N 373 See Stanford Banking Company v. Smith, [1892] 1 Q B. 765. [662] grenfell v. girdlestone. Dec 1st, 4th, 5th, 15th, 1837 ^Upon a bill filed by a judgment creditor one day before the stat 3 & 4 Will......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
PRINCIPLES OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OR PART-PAYMENT
...action then starts to run from the date of the fresh contractual relationship. In Stamford Spalding & Boston Banking Co. v. Smith (1892) 1 Q.B. 765, Lord Herschell at p. 768 stated thus concerning the effect of a document which is relied upon as an acknowledgement: "it cannot be dispute......