Stanley v Thomas
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1939 |
| Date | 1939 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
R v County of London Quarter Sessions Appeals Committee, ex parte Rossi
...is to be "served on or sent by registered post" to the offender, it has been heldagain that "sent" merely no ans dispatched, c.f. Stanley V. Thomas 1939 2 King's Bench, 462, Holt v. Dyson, 1951 1 King's Bench 364, and Sandland v. Neale, 1955 3 All England Reports 571. On the other hand, i......
-
The Queen v United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting and Another
...and it is not necessary to consider the second part of section 7. 31 In support of this submission particular reliance is placed on Stanley v. Thomas [1939] 2 KB 462. a decision of a Divisional Court on the service of a notice of intended prosecution under the Road Traffic Act 1930. It is t......
-
R v Immigration appeal tribunal ex parte Mariam Chumun and Another
...of Richmond (1858) 27 LJMC 197. Browne v BlackELR [1912] 1 KB 316. Retail Dairy Co Ltd v ClarkeELR [1912] 2 KB 388. Stanley v ThomasELR [1939] 2 KB 462. Holt v DysonELRUNK [1951] 1 KB 364: [1950] 2 All ER 840. T O Supplies (London) Ltd v Jerry CreightonELRUNK [1952] 1 KB 42: [1951] 2 All ER......
-
Parry v Brantley; Benjamin et Al v Brantley; Daniel v Brantley
...recipient afterwards (See for example: Browne v. Black [1912] 1 K.B. 316; Retail Dairy Company, Limited v. Clark [1912] 2 K.B. 388; Stanley v. Thomas [1939] 2 K.B. 462; Stewart v. Chapman [1951] 2 K.B. 792; Holt v. Dyson [1951] 1 K.B. 364). That was so even if the failure to reach the recip......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Divisional Court Cases
...state whether anotice is validif it isnotreceived within the period of 14 days by the personto whom it is addressed.InStanley v. Thomas (1939 2K.B.462; 1939J.C.L. 404)LordHewart, C.]. heldthatthe provision had been compliedwith if the notice was posted to the driver's usual residenceat a ti......
-
The Police and the Law
...is known to be residingelsewherethanat his usual place ofabode?Therecent de-cision of the Divisional Court in Stanley v. Thomas (1939,55T.L.R. 711;J.e.L.vol.iii,p. 404) will be welcomed by thosecharged withthegiving of such notices, as it supplies a clearand useful answer to both these ques......