Stapylton v O'Callaghan
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1973 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
R v Tirnaveanu (Cornel)
...was the occasion of the theft but it seems not unreasonable to regard that matter as immaterial. This, indeed, is the situation in Stapylton v. O'Callaghan itself. Professor Sir John Smith QC concluded: �It is submitted that the principle stated in Brown is right and of general application.......
-
R v Bellman
...at paragraph 18-5 it is submitted that "if the evidence is as consistent with theft or handling then, subject to the decision in Stapylton v. O'Callaghan [1973] 2 All E.R.782, the position is comparable to a situation where the evidence proves that one of two people is guilty but it is impo......
-
R v Cash
...of the appellant, the jury would have to be further directed that a verdict of guilty of theft would be open to them. (see Stapylton v O'Callaghan [1973] 2 A.E.R. 782). We do not believe that this tortuous process, leading in some cases to such an artificial verdict could have been the inte......
-
DPP v Fowler
... ... NOEL FOWLER Applicant Citations: LARCENY ACT 1916 S33 LARCENY ACT 1990 S3 STAPYLTON V O'CALLAGHAN 1973 2 AER 782 THEFT ACT 1968 S1 UK THEFT ACT 1968 S22 UK LARCENY ACT 1916 S2 R V BELLMAN 1989 AC 839 R V ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results