Steele v Steele
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Chancery Division |
| Year | 2001 |
| Date | 2001 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
65 cases
-
Ronald Peter Binstead v Zytronic Displays Ltd
...on all three grounds. The result is significant repetition. 43 In JD Wetherspoon Plc v Harris and Ors [2013] EWHC 1088 (Ch)Steele v Steele [2001] CP Rep 106, Neuberger J (as he then was) set out, following a detailed examination of the law, those issues which he thought appropriate to a det......
-
Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Mastercard Incorporated and Others
...court should take in considering whether to order a preliminary issue is the decision of Mr Justice Neuburger (as he then was) in Steele v Steele [2001] NPC 141. There the learned judge listed a number of factors to which a court should have regard. The list is very helpfully set out in the......
-
Simon Howard v Chelsea Yacht and Boat Company Ltd
...are found in: (1) Section 8 of the Technology and Construction Court (“TCC”) Guide – 2018 White Book, Vol 2, paras 2C-43; (2) Steele v Steele [2001] CP Rep 106 – a decision of Neuberger J, in which he identified 10 factors which could be relevant; (3) McLoughlin v Jones [2001] EWCA Civ 1743......
-
OJSC VTB Bank v Parline Ltd & Others
...Russian law gives a unique status to questions involving insolvency, ruling out claims under articles 1064 and 1082Steele v Steele [2001] CP Rep 106. It was this. If Professor Maggs were right, then Russian insolvency law trumped everything. I readily accept that, if Professor Maggs is righ......
Get Started for Free
