Stekel v Ellice

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1973
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • M Young Legal Associates Ltd v Zahid (A Firm) and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 16 Mayo 2006
    ...in the light of the passage of a century during which, were it valid, one might expect a court clearly so to have stated. 30 The case of Stekel v Ellice [1973] 1 WLR 191 runs counter to Mr Blackett-Ord's submissions; and in effect he accepts that, if we are to uphold his submissions, we nee......
  • Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Lim Chor Pee
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 2 Marzo 2006
    ...a salaried partner and also confirmed that he (ie, the respondent) was entitled to “all the billings of the firm”. 27 In Stekel v Ellice [1973] 1 WLR 191, a case relied upon by the appellant, Megarry J held that the fact that a person was described as a salaried partner was not conclusive o......
  • Chua Ka Seng v Boonchai Sompolpong
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 11 Enero 1993
    ...holding out, especially in the professions, is fraught with many difficulties. This was explained by Megarry J in Stekel v Ellice [1973] 1 WLR 191[1973] 1 All ER 465 at pp 198D-F, 199G-H: Certain aspects of a salaried partnership are not disputed. The term `salaried partner` is not a term o......
  • McAleenan v AIG (Europe) Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 16 Julio 2010
    ...Fire and Life Assurance Corporation Limited v Midland Bank Limited [1940] 2 KB 388; [1940] 3 All ER 252 followed - Stekel v Ellice [1973] 1 WLR 191; [1973] 1 All ER 465 and Yorkville Nominees Pty Ltd v Lissenden (1985-1986) 160 CLR 475 approved - New Hampshire Insurance Company v MGN Ltd [1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Formation and Expansion
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Partnership and LLP Law - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 Agosto 2018
    ...Limited [2010] EWHC 1563 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 235 (Jun). 9 See e.g. Newstead v Frost [1980] 1 WLR 135. 10 Stekel v Ellice [1973] 1 WLR 191. Formation and Expansion 15 v Zahid (a firm) and others , 11 the Court of Appeal held that there was a partnership between the fourth and fifth defen......
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Partnership and LLP Law - 2nd edition Contents
    • 29 Agosto 2018
    ...130 ER 452, Ct of CP 84 Steiglitz v Egginton (1815) Holt NP 141, 71 ER 193, [1814–23] All ER Rep 455, Ct of CP 56, 84 Stekel v Ellice [1973] 1 WLR 191, [1973] 1 All ER 465, 117 Sol Jo 126, ChD 14, 19 Stevens v Bower; sub nom Bower v Hughes Hooker & Co EAT/1076/02 SM, [2003] Lexis Citation 1......
  • Case Note
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 Diciembre 2011
    ...note. Any errors or omissions, however, remain the author‘s own. 1“The term ‘salaried partner‘ is not a term of art …”: Stekel v Ellice [1973] 1 WLR 191 at 198, per Megarry J (cited with approval in Chua Ka Seng v Boonchai Sompolpong [1993] 1 SLR(R) 17 (CA)); “[A]n agreement for a person to......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT