Stewart Chartering Ltd v C. & O. Managements S.A. (Practice Note)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1979
CourtQueen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
[QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION] STEWART CHARTERING LTD. v. C. & O. MANAGEMENTS S.A. AND ANOTHER [1979 S. No. 3986] PRACTICE NOTE 1979 Dec. 21 Robert Goff J.

Practice - Judgment in default of appearance - Mareva injunction - Claim for liquidated damages and Mareva injunction - Mareva injunction granted - Application for leave to sign judgment in default of appearance - Court's jurisdiction to grant leave and continue Mareva injunction - R.S.C., Ord. 13, r. 6F1

APPLICATION for leave to enter judgment in default of appearance.

By a specially indorsed writ dated August 22, 1979, the plaintiffs, Stewart Chartering Ltd., claimed against the defendants, C. & O. Managements S.A. of Greece and Palirima Shipping Co. Ltd. of Cyprus, £23,101.33 in respect of services rendered, and an injunction to restrain the defendants from, inter alia, removing from the jurisdiction any of their assets, save in so far as such assets exceeded £32,500.

By orders of the same date, Judge Hawser, sitting as a commercial judge, Queen's Bench Division, granted the injunction and gave leave to serve notice of the writ on the defendants outside the jurisdiction.

The defendants failed to enter an appearance and on December 13, 1979, the plaintiffs, notwithstanding that a claim for an injunction was not mentioned in R.S.C., Ord. 13, rr. 1 to 4, applied ex parte in chambers to Robert Goff J. for leave to enter judgment in default of appearance.

No cases are referred to in the judgment or were cited in argument.

Jonathan Hirst for the plaintiffs.

ROBERT GOFF J. read the following judgment in open court. There is before the court an ex parte application for leave to sign judgment in default of appearance in an action for a liquidated sum brought against the defendants outside the jurisdiction who have been properly served with proceedings pursuant to leave granted under R.S.C., Ord. 11. In the ordinary course, no appearance having been entered, judgment could be entered for the sum claimed without leave of the court; but the matter is complicated by the fact that, in order to obtain a Mareva injunction, the writ is indorsed in addition with a claim for an injunction. In such circumstances, having regard to the provisions of R.S.C., Ord. 13, r. 6, it is not possible for the plaintiffs simply to enter judgment in default of appearance; and in the present case, the chief clerk in the judgment room has quite rightly declined to permit the plaintiffs so to proceed.

I am therefore presented...

To continue reading

Request your trial
54 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT