Stewart v Kennedy (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1889 |
| Date | 1889 |
| Court | House of Lords (England) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Percy v Church of Scotland Board of National Mission
...of ScotlandENR 1914 SC 16 Skerret v OliverUNK (1896) 23 R 468; (1896) 3 SLT 257 Stewart v KennedyELR (1890) 17 R (HL) 25; (1890) LR 15 App Cas 108 Trussed Steel Concrete Co Ltd v GreenELR [1946] Ch 115 Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) LtdWLRUNKICR [1993] 1 WLR 49; [1992] 4 All ER 929; [1993] ICR 1......
- Sargent v Asl Developments Ltd
-
Highland & Universal Properties Ltd v Safeway Properties Ltd (No.2)
... ... Noonhaven LtdUNK (1989) 2 EGLR 50 Salaried Staff London Loan Co Ltd v Swears & Wells LtdSC 1985 SC 189 Stewart v Kennedy (1890) 17 R (HL) 1 Visionhire Ltd v Britel Fund Trustees Ltd 1991 SLT 883 Webster v Lord AdvocateSC ... ...
-
TAN PHIT SIAN vs LING SEI NGIIK
...MLJ 1, PC; Kannappa Chettiar v Vellasamy Pillai [1977] 1 MLJ 255; Serrao v Noel (1855) 15 QBD 549, CA (Eng); Stewart v Kennedy (No 2) (1890) 15 App Cas 108, Re South American and Mexican Co, ex p Bank of England [1895] 1 Ch 37, CA (Eng); Wilding v Sanderson [1897] 2 Ch 534, CA (Eng); Law v ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
CONCEPT OF NON EST FACTUM
...1004 at 1016 per Lord Reid. Powell v. Smith 1872 LR 14 Eq. 85; Tamplin v. James (1880) 15 Ch. D. 215 C.A; Steward v. Kennedy (No. 2) (1890) 15 App Cas 108 HL On the authorities, the plea of the plaintiff/appellant that he could not and did not appreciate the contents of the deed, in our opi......