Stills Case
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Date | 01 January 1792 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 80 E.R. 607
COURT OF WARDS, AND OTHER COURTS AT WESTMINSTER
pasch. 9 jacobi regis. stills case. The jury found upon a diem clausit extremum, after the death of Jane Still, that Thomas and John Horner (die mortis Janse) were seised in their demesne, as in fee of the mannor of Moreton, as by deed of bargain and sale, made between Thomas Harris Knight, and Edward Harris his son of the one part, and the said Thomas and John Horner of the other part, dated 30 Junii, primo Jacobi, and by a fine between the aforesaid Thomas and John Horner of the other part made, appeareth, they found that sic inde sesitus, Thomas and John Horner, by indenture, the 15 of October, primo Jacobi, made between the said Thomas and John Horner of the one part, and the said 608 DAKINS CASE LEY, 31. Jane of the other part, reciting, that whereas Tho. Harris Knight, and Edw. Harris, by their indenture, by appointment of the said Jane, upon secret confidence reposed by the said Jane, in Thomas and John Homer, granted the said man nor to the said Thomas and John Horner, and their heirs, and further, in dicta indenture ulterius mentionatur, reciting, that the said Jane paid 1001. arid that the true meaning of all the parties, dictue indentura, ultimo meutionaUe, was always, that notwithstanding any consideration or use in dicta indentura, or in the writings to the contrary expressed, that the same manner should continue to such uses as were mentioned in dicta indentura ultimo mentionata, & ad nullum alium usum, & per dictam irulen-turam ultimo mentionatam, the said Thomas and John Horner, covenanted with the said Jane, to stand seised of the said manner, to the use of the said Jane in tail, and after to such uses as the said Jane should nominate, et per dictam in-[31]-denturam ultimo mentionatam apparet, & prtedicti juratores dicunt...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Explicaciones
...3 des Gesetzes vom 25. Juli 2013 (BGBl. I S. 2749) geändert worden ist –VwVfG–], §§ 20, 21; la Ley española de procedimiento administrativo [Ley 30/1992, de 26 de noviembre, de Régimen Jurídico de las Administraciones Públicas y del Procedi-miento Administrativo Común (BOE núm. 285, de 27.1......
-
El contexto de la armonización fiscal en la Unión Europea
...[44] El antecedente del IVA comunitario se encuentra en la Taxe sur la Valeur Ajoutée introducida en Francia en 1954. En España, sería la Ley 30/1985, de 2 de agosto, del Impuesto sobre el Valor Añadido, que venía a reformar la imposición indirecta española con motivo de la adhesión de Espa......
-
Abreviaturas
...vez por la Ley 2/2011, de 4 de marzo, de Economía Sostenible, BOE núm. 55, de 5.3.2011 [Ley española de Administración electrónica]. LRJPAC Ley 30/1992, de 26 de noviembre, de Régimen Jurídico de las Administraciones Públicas y del Procedimiento Administrativo Común (BOE núm. 285, de 27.11.......
-
Concepto, fundamento y naturaleza del principio de proporcionalidad
...suele reconducirse a la actuación de la Administración Pública y de sus funcionarios o agentes (al respecto, véanse los art. 35 y 41 de la Ley 30/1992 de régimen jurídico de las Administraciones Públicas y del Procedimiento Administrativo Page 321 Pero también aquí, resulta pertinente conec......