Stoddart v Sagar
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1895 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
- Automatic Totalisators Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
-
Treasure Bay (St Lucia) Ltd Claimant v [1] The Gaming Authority [2] The Cabinet of Saint Lucia [3] The National Lotteries Authority [4] The Minister for Social Transformation Youth and Sports Respondents Cage St. Lucia Ltd Interested Party [ECSC]
...contentions to cease, and decides between the mighty." 87 Even in the 19 th century the English courts were drawing a clear line. In Stoddard v Sagar (1895) 2 Q.B. 474 a newspaper issued coupons for a competition in which the participants could (for 2 shillings) get a prize for forecasting ......
-
Treasure Bay (St. Lucia) Ltd v Gaming Authority et Al
...by some element of dexterity, skill, knowledge or judgment. [Even in the 19th century the English courts were drawing a clear line. In Stoddard v. Sagar (1895) 2 Q.B. 474 a newspaper issued coupons for a competition in which the participants could (for 2 shillings) get a prize for forecasti......
-
Imperial Tobacco Ltd v Attorney General
...entirely dependent on chance. If any element of skill entered into it, it was not a lottery.This was established in the first case of stoddart v. Sagar (1895) 2 Q.B. 474. A newspaper issued coupons for a competition in which the participants could (for 2 shillings) get a prize for forecasti......
Request a trial to view additional results