Stokes and Another, Overseers of St. Vedast's, otherwise Foster, against Lewis and Another, Overseers of St. Michael le Quern
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1785 |
| Date | 1785 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
R. v. Pan (R.W.), (1999) 120 O.A.C. 1 (CA)
...to. [para. 102]. R. v. Farinacci (L.W.) et al. (1993), 67 O.A.C. 197; 86 C.C.C.(3d) 32 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 123]. Vaise v. Delaval (1785), 99 E.R. 949; 1 Term. Rep. 11 (K.B.), refd to. [paras. 129, Danis v. Saumure (1956), 3 D.L.R.(2d) 221 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 130]. Matthews and For......
-
Osborne v Rogers, Executor of Weston
...it; for I may have a good reason to resist the payment of the money, and another person shall not pay it for me, whether I will or not. 1 T. R. 20, Stokes v. Lems.(e) (b) So even an affidavit (to hold to bail) of debt for money lent, and for goods sold and delivered, and for work and labour......
-
Armstrong and Anothr v Swann
...v. Payne 13 Q. B. 900. Foster v. LeyENR 2 Bing. N. C. 269; S. C. 2 Scott, 438. Sephens v. BadcockENR 3 B. & Ad. 354. Stokes v. LewisENR 1 T. R 20. 3 A. & E. 331. Spencer v. Parry 3 A. & E. 331. Shadbolt v. WoodfallENR 2 Coll. 30. Hales v. Freeman 1 Brod. & B. 391. Pleading — Court for Money......
-
Grissell and Another v Robison
...the expense of the lease is usually borne by the lessee, not that it is payable in the first instance by the lessor. In Stokes v. Lewis (1 T. R. 20) it was held, that assumpsit for money paid, laid out, and expended, would not lie when the money had been paid against the express consent of ......
Request a trial to view additional results