Stone v Stone
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1958 |
| Year | 1958 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Bess et Al v Ho Young et Al
...and after her husband returned to live in St. Vincent in 1971 she kept sending monies for him. 70 I gave consideration to the case of Stone v. Stone [1959]) 1 ALL ER 194 referred to by Mr. Sylvester., I find the facts as found by the court therein totally different from the facts of this ca......
-
Hawkes v Hawkes
...-Henderson v. Henderson, [1967] P. 77; [1965] 1 All E.R. 179. (6) -May v. May, [1943] 2 All E.R. 146, applied. (7) -Stone v. Stone, [1958] 1 W.L.R. 1287; [1959] 1 All E.R. 194, considered. (8) -Udny v. Udny(1869), L.R. 1 Sc. & Div. App. 441, dictum of Lord Westbury applied. (9) -White v. Te......
-
Lu Sui Ping v Gao Li Fu
...residence in quarters or barracks may not be a bar to having the intention to reside permanently or indefinitely; see Stone v Stone [1958] 1 WLR 1287. However, one has to look at the whole picture. The fact is that Mr Gao maintained his home in Guangzhou throughout his stay in Hong Kong, an......
1 books & journal articles
-
The Requisite Intention for the Acquisition of Domicile of Choice: Permanent or Indefinite – A Comparative Perspective
...house, or even in a military camp. See McClean and Beevers, Morris, The Conflict of Laws, supra note 11, p. 34. See also Stone v Stone [1958] 1 WLR 1287, Willar v Willar (1954) SC 144. But these, however, would be relevant in deciding the existence of an intention. See Kahn, ‘The South Afri......