Stooke v Taylor
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1879 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
47 cases
-
B.I.C.C. Plc v Burndy Corporation
...first class in Hanak v. Green, Morris L.J. at page 23 approved the explanation of the basis of the doctrine given by Cockburn C.J. in Stooke v. Taylor (1880) 5 Q.B. 569 at 576 that the existence and amount of such a set-off must be taken to be known to a plaintiff who should give credit for......
- Chartered Bank of India, Australia & China, The v The Public Trustee
- Piccone v Suncorp Metway Insurance Ltd
-
OCWS Logistics Pte Ltd v Soon Meng Construction Pte Ltd
... ... In the later case Stooke v Taylor [1880] 5 QBD 569 at p 575 Cockburn CJ said the plea of set-off `is available only where the claims on both sides are in respect of ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Action
...is that they are wholly independent suits which for convenience are combined in one action.” Cockburn, C.J. In Stooke v. Taylor (1880) 5 Q.B.D. 569 at pages 575/8, expressed a similar opinion in the following terms: - “in my opinion it is altogether a mistake to treat a counter-claim and a ......
-
SET-OFF
...cannot be made in any claim other than monetary. The plea of set-off serves as a shield, and not as a sword. See Stooke v. Taylor (1880) 5 Q.B.D. 569 at 576." - Per Saulawa, J.C.A., in F.B.N. Plcv. I.A.S.C.A. (Nig.) Ltd. Suit No. CA/L/774/2008; (2015) 3 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1445) 1 at...