Stransky v Stransky
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1954 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
28 cases
-
Wheeler v Wheeler
...[1982] Q.B. 688; [1982] 1 All E.R. 698; on appeal, [1983] 2 A.C. 309; [1983] 1 All E.R. 226, followed. (6) -Stransky v. Stransky, [1954] P. 428; [1954] 2 All E.R. 536, followed. Legislation construed: Matrimonial Causes Law (Law 9 of 1976), s.2(1): The relevant terms of this sub-section are......
-
Ikimi v Ikimi
...1950 re-enacted this development. The ordinary residence provisions in section 18 were considered by Karminski J in Stransky v Stransky [1954] p 428. He had to decide whether the wife could establish jurisdiction on the basis of ordinary residence during the period of three years preceding ......
-
R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Nilish Shah
...P. 397 is authority for the proposition that a man may change his ordinary residence in the course of a day. In Stransky v. Stransky [1954] P. 428 nothing was said to suggest that the tax cases were of specific application only, or that the “real home” test was the only test. Clarke v. Insu......
-
R v Barnet London Borough Council, ex parte Nilish Shah
...resident" could not be interpreted as comparable with domicile but must be given their usual and ordinary meaning. 30The other case is Stransky v. Stransky [1954] P. 428 upon which counsel for the L.E.A.s placed reliance in submitting that in determining ordinary residence the test is the ......
Request a trial to view additional results