Stratford against Neale

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date17 November 1721
Date17 November 1721
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 88 E.R. 1

IN THE KING'S BENCH.

Stratford against Neale

MODERN REPORTS; or, SELECT CASES ADJUDGED in the COURTS of KING'S BENCH, CHANCERY, COMMON PLEAS, and EXCHEQUER. Volume the Eighth; containing, CASES in the King's Bench, from the Eighth to the Twelfth Year of KING GEORGE the FIRST. The Fifth Edition, corrected. By THOMAS LEACH, Esq. of the Middle Temple, Barrister at Law. 1795. [1] michaelmas term. The Eighth of George the First, 1721. In the King's Bench. Sir John Pratt, Knt., Chief Justice. Sir Lyttleton Powys, Krit., Sir Robert Eyre, Knt., Sir John Fortescue Aland, Knt., Justices. Sir Robert Raymond, Knt., Attorney General. Sir Philip Yorke, Knt., Solicitor General. case 1. stratford against neale. Friday, 17 November, 1721 (a). Easter Term, 3 Geo. 1, Roll 184. If a parson libel in the Spiritual Court for two third parts of the tithes of dry cattle, and, on a declaration in prohibition, the defendant plead a right to two integral parts of the tithes of dry cattle, the variance between the libel and the declaration is not material-Yelv. 79. 6 Com. Dig. "Prohibition" (K.). 1 Mod. 182. Writ of error on a judgment given in the Court of King's Bench in Ireland (b). The case was thus: One Neale libelled in the Spiritual Court there for two third parts of the tithes, due to him for dry cattle fed in such a parish, &c. The defendant suggested, for a prohibition, that the cattle for which those tithes were demanded were beasts of the plough, and other dry cattle fed in the said parish with hay and stubbles of corn, for which tithes had already been paid. A prohibition was thereupon granted; and that the right might come in question, Stratford was ordered to declare upon the prohibition; which he did, and in the same manner as before he had suggested, and concluded his declaration, that the defendant (a) This case was argued once before, viz. Friday, 27 January 1720, and five more exceptions were taken; which see in Fortesc. Rep. 350. The case at large, with both the arguments, and the opinion of the Court, are in Stra. 482.-Note to former Edition. (b) The writ of error to the King's Bench in England on judgments given in the Courts in Ireland is taken away by 23 Geo. 3. Sea Mr. Christian's edit. 1 vol. Bl. Com. 104, and Mi1. Serjeant Runnington's fifth edit, of Hale's Com. Law, vol. ii. page 7 to 18, note (A). K. B. xvii.-1 2 MICHAELMAS TERM, 8 OEO. 1. IN B. R. 8 MOD. 2. had proceeded in the Spiritual Court after a prohibition...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • The King against Harrison
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1795
    ...from Pembroke gaol to Hereford gaol, or whether they were first brought up hither. K. B. xvii.-4* 106 TRINITY TERM, 9 GEO. 1. IN B. R. 8 MOD. 1S9. will always bring his cause to be tried there; and as it has been already observed, the poor man must suffer for want of money to carry all his ......
  • Croucher v Collins
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1845
    ...It is like the not finding of vi e.t armis in an action of trespass, which is held to be immaterial. 1 Str. 482, Stratford v. Neale. S. C. 8 Mod. 1, vide ante, p. 81, Lawe v. King.(e) (5) So called, because upon consultation had, the Judges find the prohibition to be ill-founded ; and there......
  • Stratford against Neale
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 January 1796
    ...Citation: 88 E.R. 1085 IN THE KING'S BENCH.Stratford against Neale case 439. stratford against neale. Prohibition.-S. C. 1 Stra. 482. S. C. 8 Mod. 1. S. C. Fort. 350. Writ of error on a judgment on prohibition in the Common Pleas in Ireland, for tithes as rector of . The libel was for agist......
  • The King against Alexander John
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1795
    ...year, shall be capable to be chosen into the same office for the year immediately ensuing." (b) Post, 166. (c) See 32 Geo. 3, c. 58, s. 3. 8MOD.1M. TRINITY TERM, 9 QEO. 1. IN B. R. 103 office, when that right had been tried upon an information, and found against the defendant that he had no......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • SOCOM WATERCRAFT NEW SPECIAL OPERATIONS UNDERSEA, SURFACE VEHICLES ON THE HORIZON.
    • United States
    • National Defense Vol. 103 No. 786, May 2019
    • 1 May 2019
    ...year taken delivery of the first two production systems for the shallow water combat submersible program which is meant to replace aging MK-8, Mod 1 SEAL delivery "The SWCS represents a significant improvement over the legacy... [system] in several areas," she told National Defense in an em......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT