Strickland v Hayes
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1896 |
| Year | 1896 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
DPP v Hutchinson
...act upon the remainder of the byelaw, which is perfectly good and reasonable. I think, therefore, the conviction should stand." 12In Strickland v. Hayes [1896] 1 Q.B. 290, 292, Lindley L.J. said: "I have no doubt whatever that those words are bad. But that being so, is the rest of the byel......
- R v Dyfed CC ex parte Manson
-
Enniscorthy Urban Distriot Council, Appellants; Field, Respondent
... ... Moreover, a wall 4 feet high would be of no effect to provide against the frightening of horses. The by-law is too wide: Strickland v. Hayes (1). The expression “land immediately adjoining or abutting upon any street or road” in the by-law cannot be restricted to mean the ... ...
-
The Commissioners of Public Works in Ireland and Henry Williams, Secretary v John Monaghan and James Monaghan
... ... “Dated the 10th day of August, 1865. “Thomas Lefroy, Ch. J. I., “E. Hayes, Third Justice, Q. B.” The summons alleged that the defendants on the 2nd July, 1908, at a place in the bed and soil of the River ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results