Strickland v Hayes
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1896 |
| Year | 1896 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
DPP v Hutchinson
...of the byelaw, which is perfectly good and reasonable. I think, therefore, the conviction should stand." 12In Strickland v. Hayes [1896] 1 Q.B. 290, 292, Lindley L.J. said: "I have no doubt whatever that those words are bad. But that being so, is the rest of the byelaw bad? There is plenty......
-
Thames Water Authority v Elmbridge Borough Council
...part of the text when it is able to do so. The same policy has been followed in relation to byelaws where the text permitted ( Strickland v. Hayes (1896) 1 Queen's Bench 290), and to a demand for a return, part of which could be struck out from a form ( Potato Marketing Board v. Merricks (1......
-
Director of Public Prosecutions v. Hutchinson and Smith, (1990) 113 N.R. 12 (HL)
...of Faversham (1799), 8 Term. 352, refd to. [para. 8]. R. v. Lundie (1862), 8 Jur. N.S. 640, refd to. [para. 8]. Strickland v. Hayes, [1896] 1 Q.B. 290, refd to. [para. 9]. The Employers' Liability Cases, Re (1908), 207 U.S. 463, refd to. [para. 10]. R. v. Commonwealth Court of Conciliation ......
-
The Town and Country Planning Act 1971 and Others
...part of the text when it is able to do so. The same policy has been followed in relation to bye-laws where the text permitted ( Strickland v. Hayes (1896) 1 Q.B.290), and to a demand for a return, part of which could be struck out from a form ( Potato Marketing Board v. Merricks (1958) 2 Q.......
Request a trial to view additional results