Stringer v Stringer

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Year1952
Date1952

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • Lilley v Lilley
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Starkie v Starkie (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • Jones v Jones
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Northrop v Northrop
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 11 May 1967
    ...1951 (unreported) and in Lilley v. Lilley, (1960) Probate, 158, and followed on frequent occasions by the Divisional Court, notably in Stringer v. Stringer, (1952) Probate, 171, and Pinnick v. Pinnick, (1957) 1 Weekly Law Reports, 644. It has not been argued in the present case that those......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Theory of the Polish People's Democracy
    • United States
    • Sage Political Research Quarterly No. 9-4, December 1956
    • 1 December 1956
    ...Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1950), pp. 131-71; and H. Seton-Watson, The East European Revolution (London: Methuen & Co., 1952), pp. 171-78. 11 Minc, op. cit., p. Socialist revolution, for the &dquo;Great October Socialist Revolution&dquo; alsosolved in passing a number of task......