Stringer v Stringer
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1952 |
| Year | 1952 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Northrop v Northrop
...1951 (unreported) and in Lilley v. Lilley, (1960) Probate, 158, and followed on frequent occasions by the Divisional Court, notably in Stringer v. Stringer, (1952) Probate, 171, and Pinnick v. Pinnick, (1957) 1 Weekly Law Reports, 644. It has not been argued in the present case that those......
-
National Assistance Board v Parkes
...he is under no such duty, and is not guilty of wilful neglect to maintain her. That is, I think, the effect of the decision in Stringer v. Stringer, 1952 Probate, page 171. 6 There is one more remaining case to consider. It may sometimes happen that, when the parties separate, the husband r......
- Medford v Medford
-
Medford v Medford
...to have made no request for maintenance is immaterial. The onus is on him to prove that he is excused from maintaining her as in Springer v. Springer [1952] 1 All E.R. 373 where the separation was consensual. See also Papadopoulos v. Papadopoulos [1930] p. 55. For the above reasons the appe......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Theory of the Polish People's Democracy
...Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1950), pp. 131-71; and H. Seton-Watson, The East European Revolution (London: Methuen & Co., 1952), pp. 171-78. 11 Minc, op. cit., p. Socialist revolution, for the &dquo;Great October Socialist Revolution&dquo; alsosolved in passing a number of task......