Strix Ltd v Otter Controls Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1991 |
| Year | 1991 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
FE Global Electronics Pte Ltd and Others v Trek Technology (Singapore) Pte Ltd and Another Appeal
...(folld) Smith Kline & French Laboratories Limited v Evans Medical Limited [1989] FSR 561 (refd) Strix Limited v Otter Controls Limited [1991] FSR 354 (folld) Patents Act (Cap 221, 2002 Rev Ed) ss 13 (1), 14, 15, 83, 84 (3) Ponnampalam Sivakumar (Joseph Lopez & Co) for the appellants in CA 7......
-
R Coventry Airport and Another and Others Dover Harbour Board and Others Associated British Ports and Another
...the law is the test is, was the conduct of the case wholly unreasonable by Dover? There is a case called Strix Limited v Otter Controls [1991] FSR 354. LORD JUSTICE SIMON BROWN 222 I would be surprised if it is an application, but we will hear it of course. 223 MR FIELD: We had a similar ca......
-
Resolution Chemicals Ltd v H. Lundbeck A/s
...appropriate in patent cases even on issues as to claim construction and infringement for the reasons explained by Dillon LJ in Strix Ltd v Otter Controls Ltd [1991] FSR 354 at 357–358 and Aldous LJ in Monsanto & Co v Merck & Co [2000] RPC 77 at 126 In Eli Lilly & Co Ltd v Neopharma Ltd [......
-
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Delta Airways Inc.
...is common ground that summary judgment is rarely appropriate in patent cases. The reasons for this were explained by Dillon LJ in Strix Ltd v Otter Controls Ltd [1991] FSR 354 and Aldous LJ in Monsanto & Co v Merck & Co [2000] RPC 5335. In Strix Dillon LJ (with whom Croom-Johnson LJ agree......
Request a trial to view additional results