Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Stroms Bruk Aktie Bolag v John and Peter Hutchison (A Firm)

The Law Reports Fraser's Court of Session Cases, 5th Series Aspinall's Maritime Cases Cited authorities 11 Cited in 120 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date04 August 1905
Docket NumberNo. 12.
Date04 August 1905
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
97 cases
  • Barbara Kiddell v Windjammer Landing Company Ltd
    • St Lucia
    • High Court (Saint Lucia)
    • 14 February 2007
    ...common law relating to awards for general and special damages was pronounced by Lord Mac Naughten inStroms Bruks Aktie Bolag v Hutchinson [1905] A.C. 515 at pages 525–526. "General Damages … are such as the law will presume to be a direct natural or probable consequence of the action compla......
  • Roselyne Cecil Kusa v Motor Vehicle Insurance (PNG) Trust (2003) N2328
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 24 January 2003
    ...claimed and proved strictly. This principle was stated by Lord Macnaugton in Stroms Bruks Aktie Bolag –v- John and Peter Hutchinson [1905] A.C 515 at page 525. “Special damages ….. are such that as the law will not infer from the nature of the act. They do not follow in the ordinary course.......
  • Siti Sarinah bt Sibun v Azizah bt Kamaruddin
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2009
  • Yasuyuki Kayashima v Dato' Seri F Konishi
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2011
    • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Clark v. Macourt: defective sperm and performance substitutes in the High Court of Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 38 No. 2, December - December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...legislation operates in Australia: see above n 54. (105) [1920] 2 KB 11. (106) [1914] AC 510. See also Stroms Bruks AB v Hutchinson [1905] AC 515, 526 (Lord (107) [1998] QB 87. (108) See Treitel, above n 18 (expressing a preference for Thorpe LJs dissenting speech); Stevens, 'Damages and th......
  • Environmental Law
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 9 Environmental Law
    • 29 June 2016
    ...is a matter of law. This distinction is manifest from the following two English decisions: - (a) Stroms Bruks Aktie Bolag v. Hutchison (1905) A.C. p. 515 and; (b) British Transport Commission v. Gourley (1956) A.C. p. 185. In Stroms Bruks Aktie Bolag v. Hutchison, Lord MacNaughton, at pages......
  • SPECIAL DAMAGES AND GENERAL DAMAGES, DISTINCTION BETWEEN
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition S
    • 6 February 2019
    ...in Emirate Airline v. Ngonadi (No. 2) Suit No. CA/L/124/2010; (2014) 9 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 1413) 506 at 545. (6) "In Bolag v. Hutchinson (1905) A.C. 515 LORD MACNAUGHTEN at page 525 stated that: "It seems to me that this argument is founded on an inaccurate use or perhaps I should say a less accu......
  • GENERAL DAMAGES AND SPECIAL DAMAGES, DISTINCTION BETWEEN
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition Final Sections Volume 4
    • 6 February 2019
    ...and proved strictly. There are too many decided authorities in this regard. But see the cases of Stroms Bruks Aktie Bolag v. Hutchisom (1905) A.C. 515 at 525 - 526 - per Lord Machnaghten; Admiralty Commissioners v. Susquehanna (1926) A.C. 655 at 661 - per Lord Dunedin, Messrs. Dumez (Nig.) ......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT