Stuart v Bell
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1891 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
140 cases
- Goh Chok Tong; JB Jeyaretnam
-
Doreen Hodge Claimant v Cable & Wireless (West Indies) Ltd George Kentish Defendants [ECSC]
...to him. Counsel on both sides are ad idem in submitting that the test in determining whether such a duty existed is as stated in Stuart -v- Bell14 thus: "would the great mass of right minded men in the position of the Defendant have considered it their duty under the circumstances to make t......
-
Maidstone Pte Ltd v Takenaka Corp
... ... or furtherance of his own interests and that the receiving party had a legitimate interest in the subject matter of the publication: Stuart v Bell 2 and Watt v Longsdon .1 The plaintiffs have not contended in their submissions that there is no common interest; rather, they contend ... ...
-
Neethling v Du Preez and Others; Neethling v the Weekly Mail and Others
...1986 (3) SA 568 (A) at 586-9; Iyman v Natal Witness Printing & Publishing Co (Pty) Ltd 1991 (4) SA 677 (N) H at 682A; Stuart v Bell [1891] 2 QB 341 at 346, 351; Gatley on Libel and Slander 8th ed paras 441, 444-6, 448-9, 452, 535, 537, 540-1, 566; Adam v Ward [1917] AC 309 (HL) at 334; Ehmk......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Express Malice
...of the expression. Wade and Wells Co. v. Laing (1957), 11 D.L.R. (2d) 276 per Sheppard J.A. at 28283 (B.C.C.A.), citing Stuart v. Bell, [1891] 2 Q.B. 341 per Lindley LJ. at 349: 33 2 CANADIA N LIBE L AN D SLANDE R ACTION S But the question still remains whether the defendant was not under a......
-
Foundations of Charity Law in the New Welfare State
...on Civil and Political Rights.79 Under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.80 [1998] 3 WLR 862.81 Stuart vBell [1891] 2 QB 341, 346 (CA), per Lindley LJ, drawing upon Toogood vSpyring (1834) 1CM & R 181, 193, per Parke B.82 n 80 above, 909.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 62346......
-
MALICE USUALLY PLEADED IN DEFAMATION
...6 R. 67 at p. 72, Lord Herschell said: Malice means making use of the occasion for some indirect purpose". Again, in Stuart v. Bell (1891) 2 Q.B. 341 at p. 351, the point was stated by Lindley, L.J. as follows: - "Malice, in fact, is not confined to personal spite and ill will, but it inclu......
-
PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION AND PRIVILEGED OCCASION, DISTINCTION BETWEEN
...Stuart v. Bell (1891) 2 Q.B. 341, Lopes, L.J., explained the rules governing qualified privileges as follows; "A confusion is often made between a privileged communication and a privileged occasion. It is for the jury to say whether a communication was privileged; but the question whether a......