Studebaker Distributors Ltd v Charlton Steam Shipping Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1937
Year1937
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Sea Tank Shipping as (formerly known as Tank Invest as) v Vinnlustodin HF and another; The Aqasia
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 February 2018
    ...basis that a “unit” in Article IV rule 5 meant a physical item of cargo rather than a unit of measurement. Thus, Studebaker Distributors Ltd v Charlton Steam Shipping Co Ltd [1938] 1 KB 459 concerned a bill of lading clause which limited liability to $250 for “each package” where unboxed c......
  • The Hollandia (Haico Holwerde, Morviken)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 January 1982
    ...for this view is to be found indirectly in the following cases. 72In Tudor Baker Distributors Ltd. v. Charlton Steamship Co. Ltd. (1938) 1 King's Bench 459, there was a claim for damages for breach of contract in the carriage of a number of cars in the defendants' steamship from Norfolk, V......
  • El Greco (Aust) Pty Ltd v Mediterranean Shipping Company Sa
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Kyokuyo Company Ltd v A.P. Møller — Maersk A/S trading as "Maersk Line"
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 29 March 2017
    ...'shipping unit', in particular in the context of containerisation. 79 The only English decision cited by Tetley is Studebaker Distributors Ltd v Charlton Steam Shipping Co Ltd [1938] 1 KB 459, which decided (at 467) that " a motor-car put on a ship without a box, crate or any form of cover......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Vinnlustodin HF & Another v. Sea Tank Shipping AS ('AQASIA')
    • European Union
    • Mondaq European Union
    • 20 October 2016
    ...the context of the Hague Rules. However, the court did note the decision of Studebaker Distributors Ltd v Charlton Steam Shipping Co Ltd [1938] 1 KB 459 and The Aramis [1987] 2 Lloyd's Rep 58. These judge considered that these were of limited assistance as they did not address the question ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT