Sulaiman v Juffali

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date09 November 2001
Date09 November 2001
CourtFamily Division

FAMILY DIVISION

Before Mr Justice Munby

Sulaiman
and
Juffali

Divorce - other than by proceedings in a court of civil jurisdiction - not recognised - Talaq - Family Law Act 1986 Part 2 & Section 44 -45

English talaq ineffective

A bare talaq pronounced in England between Saudi nationals did not operate to dissolve the marriage as divorces obtained in the United Kingdom other than by proceedings in a court of civil jurisdiction were not recognised so held in a reserved judgment in the Family Division on November 9, 2001 when, inter alia, granting the wife's application for summary determination whether the pronouncement, in England, of a bare talaq by the husband was entitled to recognition under Part II of the Family Law Act 1986 as validly dissolving the marriage.

HIS LORDSHIP said that the crucial question was whether the talaq pronounced in England on June 23, 2001 was an overseas divorce within the meaning of section 45(1) of the 1986 Act.

It was accepted that the talaq had complied with all the necessary formalities required by Sharia law in Saudi Arabia, where both parties were nationals and domiciled.

As, according to the expert evidence, its validity was not dependent upon the participation or authorisation of judicial authorities but operated to dissolve the marriage as soon as it was pronounced, the divorce had clearly been obtained in this country.

It therefore fell foul of section 44(1)(a) of the 1986 Act which provided that no divorce obtained in any part of the British Islands should be regarded as effective in any part of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • R (Smeaton (on Behalf of The Society for The Protection of Unborn Children)) v Secretary of State for Health
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 18 April 2002
    ...of Nursing of the UK v Dept of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800, [1981] 1 All ER 545, [1981] 2 WLR 279, HL. Sulaiman v Juffali [2002] 1 FLR 479. Sutherland v Stopes [1925] AC 47, [1924] All ER Rep 19, Thompson v Nixon [1966] 1 QB 103, [1965] 2 All ER 741, [1965] 3 WLR 501, DC. White......
  • Christina Lynn Estrada v Walid Bin Ahmed Abdallah Al-Juffali
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 8 February 2016
    ...in March 2001. H divorced his then wife in 2001. Those divorce proceedings resulted in litigation in the High Court, reported as Sulaiman v Juffali [2002] 1 FLR 479, to which I will return later in the judgment. On the 18 th December 2001 the parties married in Dubai. 7 On the 13 th August ......
  • Estrada v Al-Juffali (Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 March 2016
    ...that also living at that address was H's first wife, to whom he was still married. That this was the case is supported by the report of Sulaiman v Juffali [2002] 1 FLR 479, a decision of Munby J on H's challenge to the court's jurisdiction in relation to the divorce from his first wife. Th......
  • X v X (Y and Z Intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 9 November 2001
    ...as a get. Nor would it be right to attempt to do so. As I said in a judgment which I delivered a few moments ago concerning a talaq ( Sulaiman v Juffali at para [47]): AAlthough historically this country is part of the Christian west, and although it has an established church which is Chris......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT