Surtees and another, Assignees of the Estate and Effects of a Bankrupt, against Ellison

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of the King's Bench
Judgment Date06 July 1829
Date06 July 1829

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
10 cases
  • Attorney-General (Qld) v Australian Industrial Relations Commission;Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations v Australian Industrial Relations Commission
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 3 October 2002
    ...The Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers' Union (2001) 108 FCR 399 at 415–416. 42Surtees v Ellison (1829) 9 B & C 750 [ 109 ER 278]; Kay v Goodwin (1830) 6 Bing 576 [ 130 ER 1403]. See also Maxwell v Murphy (1957) 96 CLR 261 at 267; Ferrum Metal Exports Pty Ltd v Lang (1......
  • Chang v Laidley Shire Council
    • Australia
    • High Court (Australia)
    • 29 August 2007
    ...9th ed (2004) at 441–443 citing Maxwell, Interpretation of Statutes, 11th ed (1962) at 216. 70 (1876) 3 Ch D 62 at 69. 71Surtees v Ellison (1829) 9 B & C 750 at 752 per Lord Tenterden CJ [ 109 ER 278 at 72R v Inhabitants of Denton (1852) Dears 3 at 8 per Lord Campbell CJ [ 169 ER 612 at 61......
  • R v Dee
    • Ireland
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 1 December 1884
    ...Barrow Ibid. 156. R. v. FlatteryELR 2 Q. B. Div.410. R. v. Young 14 Cox, C. C. 114. R. v. Camplin 1 Den. C. C. xvii Surtees v. EllisonENR 9 B. & C. 750. R. v. Allen L. R. I C. C. R. 364. R. v. FanningUNK 17 Ir. C. L. R. 289. R. v. Young 14 Cox, C. C. 114. R. v. JacksonENR Russ. & Ry. 487. R......
  • Kong Cheng Whum; Tengku Besar Zabaidah
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1969
  • Get Started for Free