Sutherland v HM Advocate (Scotland)
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | [2020] UKSC 32 |
| Year | 2020 |
| Court | Supreme Court (Scotland) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Jonathan Cobban v Director of Public Prosecutions
...have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Lord Malcolm's concurring opinion stated at [149] that the Supreme Court in Sutherland v HM Advocate for Scotland [2020] UKSC 32; [2021] AC 427 had affirmed at [31] that “reasonable expectation of privacy” was the yardstick. 93 We agree with the DPP......
-
Jonathan Cobban v Director of Public Prosecutions
...have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Lord Malcolm’s concurring opinion stated at [149] that the Supreme Court in Sutherland v HM Advocate for Scotland [2020] UKSC 32; [2021] AC 427 had affirmed at [31] that “reasonable expectation of privacy” was the yardstick. 93. We agree with the DP......
-
BC v Chief Constable, Police Scotland
...US 373 (2014); 134 S Ct 2473; 189 L Ed 2d 430 Sciacca v Italy (50774/99) [2005] ECHR 8; (2006) 43 EHRR 20 Sutherland v HM Advocate [2020] UKSC 32; 2020 SC (UKSC) 66; 2020 SLT 745; [2020] 3 WLR 327; The Times 20 July 2020 Taylor and ors v Director of the Serious Fraud Office and ors [1999] 2......
-
Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v Alex Neill Class Representative Ltd
...He submitted that this was an absurd interpretation of the agreements. He referred to the decision of the Supreme Court in Egon Zehnder v Tillman [2020] UKSC 32; [2020] AC 154 where at [38] Lord Wilson JSC said: “…the validity principle proceeds on the premise that the parties to a contract......
Get Started for Free