Suttle v Simmons
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1989 |
| Year | 1989 |
| Date | 1989 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
20 cases
-
Goberdhan et Al v Caribbean Insurance Company Ltd
...is used in s. 20(1)? So stated, the only possible answer is, in my view, ‘no’.” 13 The Harker case was followed by the Board in Suttle v. Simmons [1989] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 227, holding that the effect of section 6(1) of Bermudan legislation corresponding with section 8(1) of the Ordinance was t......
-
Argus Insurance Company Ltd v Duclos
... ... referred to in the judgment: Kosmar Holidays plc v Trustees of Syndicate 1243UNK [2008] EWCA Civ 147 Suttle v SimmonsUNK [1989] 2 Lloyds Rep 227 Harker v Caledonian Insurance CoUNK [1980] 1 Lloyds Rep 556 ... The combined effect of sections 4(l)(b) and 6 (1) of the Act was considered by the Privy Council in the case of Suttle v Simmons [1989] 2 Lloyd's Reports 227 ... This was a case on appeal to the Privy Council from the Court of Appeal for Bermuda, so dealt with the provisions of ... ...
-
Matadeen v Caribbean Insurance Company Ltd
...meaning and effect of a Bermudan statutory provision in exactly the same terms as section 10(1) was considered by the Privy Council in Suttle v Simmons [1989] 2 Lloyds Rep 227. In Bermuda the equivalent to the $200,000 specified in section 4(2)(e) was $24,000. The injured party had recover......
-
The Presidential Insurance Company Ltd v Resha St. Hill
...with the knowledge and consent of the insured, but not permitted by law to drive, it did so by adding to s.12, as noted by the Board in Suttle v Simmons [1989] 2 Ll.L.R. 17 Further, it can be said, with even greater force, that, if s.4(7) had the suggested purpose, the legislature would hav......
Get Started for Free