Swift against North
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1685 |
| Date | 01 January 1685 |
English Reports Citation: 83 E.R. 1159
IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH
Swift against North
12. swift against north. Siderf. 173, pi. 3. Heir. In debt against an heir who was by guardian, after paroll demurr and resummons, & capias alias & plur. at 5 exact' the defendant appeared, and after riens per disoent praeter pleaded, confessed the action in the C. B. and now it was specially assigned for error, that the plea was discontinued, for that the writ was not continued on the roll, 1160 HILL. 15 AND 16 CAR...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
2 cases
-
Maude against Jowett
...And vide ib. 128 b. "If a man be outlawed at the suit of one man, all men shall take advantage of this personal disability." (V) Vide Guy v. Goddard, 1 Keb. 642, and 1 Sid. 173. Sheppard v. Baillie, 6 Term Rep. 327. Hastings v. Blake, Noy, 1. Griffith v. 'Middleton, Cro. Jac. 425. Browul. B......
-
Kitchen against Bartsch
...26 THE KING V. JOHNSON 7 EAST1 Coutanche v. Le Euez, 1 East, 133, and Nowlan v. Geddes, ib. 634. (6) 1 Sid. 173. The same case is reported 1 Keb. 642, where it is said to have been adjourned ; and one of the objections there taken was, that it was not said that the defendant was outlawed su......
