Sycamore v Ley
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1932 |
| Date | 1932 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Draper v Hodder
...plaintiffs failed, so that in a sense the remarks of their Lordshipswere obiter. 16In the next case, which followed five months later, Sycamore v. Ley (1932) (147 Law Times 342) where also the plaintiffs failed, Lord Justice Greer, who had been a party to the decision in Fardon's case when ......
-
Gomberg v Smith
...as is likely to injure his neighbour - the ordinary duty to take care in the cases put upon negligence". See also Lord Justice Greer in Sycamore v. Ley, 147 Law Times, 342, at page 345. These passages were quoted with approval by Lord Justice Slesser in Dean v. Davies above. 20 Lord Atkin's......
-
Ellis v Johnstone
...for example, the remarks of Lord du Parcq in Searle v. Wallbank; of Lord Evershed in Brock v. Richards; and of Lord justice Greer in Sycamore v. Ley. 37 The Appellant asserts that there are such special circumstances here. They have been detailed by my Lord. The majority of them have to do ......
-
Brewer v. Saunders, (1986) 73 N.S.R.(2d) 93 (CA)
...neighbour - the ordinary duty to take care in the cases put upon negligence.' "From there it is but a short step to Sycamore v. Ley [(1932), 147 L.T. 342, [1932] All E.R. Rep. 97], decided a few months later and again one arising from damage done by a dog left in a parked car, the defendant......
Request a trial to view additional results