Synge v Synge
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1901 |
| Year | 1901 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
- R v L
-
Russell v Russell
...112), Rowell v. Rowell in the C.A. ( 1899, 1 Q.B. 9), Synge v. Synge before Sir Francis Jeune ( 1900, P. 80), and in the Court of Appeal ( 1901, P. 317), Gordon v. Gordon before Sir Francis Jeune ( 1903, P. 141), and Gaskell v. Gaskell before the Lord Chancellor ( 1921, Times Law Reports, V......
-
Geden Operations Ltd v Dry Bulk Handy Holdings Inc. and Another
...accept as a breach in accordance with the principles above discussed; see Hochster v De la Tour, 2 E. & B., at p 688, per Lord Campbell; Synge v Synge, [1894] 1 Q.B. 466; McIntyre v Belcher, 14 C. B. (N.S.) 654; Ogdens, Ltd v Nelson, [1905] A.C. 109. ……… A party is deemed to have incapaci......
-
Weatherley v Weatherley
...or living apart. It may be a ground upon which the party against whom the refusal is made may decide to go away; and in the case of Synge v. Synge in the Court of Appeal, which has been so much pressed upon us, Collins L.J. said that where, upon a refusal of sexual intercourse by one of the......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Election Reforms: the Trend Toward Democracy
...all persons naturalized thirty days and over, while the constitution says ninety days. For both reasons the act was void. Oregon Laws, 1901, p. 317, prescribed the way to select at a primary election delegates to nominating conven-tions. The court said that the act dees not conflict with Co......