Sywell Aerodrome Ltd v Croft

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date17 December 1941
Date17 December 1941
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
40 cases
  • Webb v Conelee Properties Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 1 November 1982
    ... ... Coman TAX(1920) 7 T.C. 517; Fry v. Salisbury House Estate Ltd. ELR[1930] A.C. 432; Sywell Aerodrome Ltd. v. Croft TAX(1941) 24 T.C. 126; Jennings v. Middlesbrough Corporation TAX(1953) 34 ... ...
  • Wildin
    • United Kingdom
    • First Tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)
    • 3 February 2022
    ...occupation” and “income derived from the carrying on of a trade” by referring to Lord Greene MR in Sywell Aerodrome, Ltd v Croft (HMIT) (1941) 24 TC 126 in the following passage at p. 137: … why and on what principle is a person who, for example, sets up a refreshment stall on his land or p......
  • De Voil v Welford Gravels Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 June 1963
    ...of Section 84 (3) of the Act, to which I shall refer in detail later. As Lord Greene, M.R., said in Croft v. Sywell Aerodrome, Ltd.(1), [1942] 1 K.B. 317, at pages 325-6, unlike the other Schedules, the annual value for the purposes of Schedule A is not assessed by reference to income actua......
  • Commissioners of Inland Revenue v George and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 5 December 2003
    ...[1940] 23TC 38, a judgment of Wrottesley J, which was treated as "manifestly correct" by Lord Greene MR in Croft v Sywell Aerodrome [1941] 24TC 126, 143. That again concerned the distinction between Schedule D and Schedule A on rather unusual facts. The appellant company had granted a lease......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Business and Property Income
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Income Tax Law. Second Edition Part III
    • 16 June 2012
    ...porters, security guards, heating and cleaning at extra charge; property ownership, not trade); see also Crofts v Sywell Aerodrome Ltd , [1942] 1 KB 317 (CA) (activities, though varied and extensive, consisted of exercise and exploitation of property rights of aerodrome); Malenfant v MNR , ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT