Szalatnay-Stacho v Fink
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 05 June 1946 |
| Date | 05 June 1946 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 26 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence; Mohammed v Ministry of Defence (No 2)
...had jurisdiction to do that. The only case in which the courts have declined to entertain the issue was R v Bottrill, Ex p Kuechenmeister [1947] KB 1, a questionable decision in a case where the Crown had continued to detain a civilian internee after the war had ended. The application for h......
-
Fayed v Al-Tajir
...to the Crown, regarding the business of a foreign State. 25 At first sight, the next case in chronological sequence, namely Szalatnay-Stacho v. Fink (1947) 1 King's Bench 1, appears much closer to the present point. It is, however, necessary to examine rather carefully what the case actuall......
-
Lincoln v Daniels
...Bankes L.J. is reported to have stated quite shortly that those facts were very different from those in Watson v. M'Ewan. 60 In Szalatnay-Stacho v. Fink (1947) 1 K.3. 1, absolute privilege was claimed for a letter of complaint, accompanied by statements, from prospective witnesses on the gr......
-
Rickshaw Investments Ltd and Another v Nicolai Baron von Uexkull
...the rule would be satisfied in any event (reference may also be made, in this regard, to the English decisions in Szalatnay-Stacho v Fink [1947] KB 1 and Metall und Rohstoff AG v Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Inc [1990] 1 QB 391 (“Metall und Rohstoff”)). The more pertinent question, perhaps, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...v. Szabo (1995), 16 R.F.L. (4th) 168, [1995] O.J. No. 1918 (Prov. Div.)... 451 Szalatnay-Stacho v. Fink (1946), [1947] 1 K.B. 1, [1946] 2 All E.R. 231, 62 T.L.R. 573 (C.A.)............................................................................... 78, 264 Szechter v. Szechter, [1971] 2 ......
-
Edward John Eyre and the conflict of laws.
...a more just result: see J H C Morris, 'Torts in the Conflict of Laws' (1949) 12 Modern Law Review 248. See also Szalatnay-Stacho v Fink [1947] KB 1. (13) See Warren v Warren [1972] Qd R 386; Coreoran v Corcoran [1974] VR 164; Borg Warner (Australia) Ltd v Zupan [1982] VR 437, 453 (Marks J).......
-
Choice of Law in Tort—Blending in with the Landscape of the Conflict of Laws?
...(Oxford: Mansfield Press, 1995)chapter 2, 58.30 A view shared by A. Briggs, ibid 60.31 Text to n 102 below.32 This was amended in 1987.33 [1947] KB 1.34 This is because s 14(2) Act only purports to abolish the rule in Boys vChaplin, of which the Szaltnayrule was not part: see n 6 above and ......
-
JURISDICTION ISSUES IN INTERNATIONAL TORT LITIGATION: A SINGAPORE VIEW
...disadvantage. 100 See supra, note 21. 101 Metall und Rohstoff AC v Donaldson Lufkin & Jenrette Inc, supra, note 21; Szalatnay-Stacho v Fink[1947] KB 1. See also, RJ Sneddon v AG Shafe[1947] MLJ 197. 102 Assuming that the defendant has no other contact with the jurisdiction. 103 See, eg, Aus......