Tagart, Beaton & Company v James Fisher & Sons

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date13 February 1903
Date13 February 1903
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
  • Cascade Shipping Inc v Eka Jaya Agencies (Pte) Ltd
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 3 February 1993
    ...the case so decided it seems difficult to reconcile the decision with that of the Court of Appeal in Tagart, Beaton & Co v Fisher & Sons ([1903] 1KB 391). Chao Hick Tin J also expressed doubts as to the correctness of this part of the judgment in Wehner [1905] 2 KB 92 We are in general agre......
  • Cascade Shipping Inc v Eka Jaya Agencies (S) Pte Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 23 May 1991
    ...attach to all freight received by the defendants after notice was served on the defendants: see Tagart Beaton & Co v James Fisher & Sons [1903] 1 KB 391 and `The Nanfri `.8 But here the plaintiffs claim entitlement on the basis that the freight is automatically theirs as the contracts of ca......
  • Richard Dale Agnew and Another v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 5 June 2001
    ...on Subfreights" (1989) LMCLQ. 191. 40 The extent of the rights conferred by the lien was described by Lord Alverstone in Tagart, Beaton & Co. v James Fisher & Sons [1903] 1 KB 391 at p. 395: "A lien such as this on a sub-freight means a right to receive it as freight and to stop that freig......
  • Western Bulk Shipowning III A/S v Carbofer Maritime Trading ApS [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 11 May 2012
    ...right to receive sub-hire as hire and to stop it at any time before it has been paid to the time charterer or his agent: Tagart v Fisher [1903] 1 KB 391 at p 395 per Lord Alverstone CJ (a case on sub-freight). In that case the freight due under the bill of lading had been paid to the charte......
  • Get Started for Free