Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1985
Year1985
Date1985

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
289 cases
54 books & journal articles
  • Employers' Liability at Common Law: Two Competing Paradigms
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , May 2008
    • 1 Mayo 2008
    ...of an implied contractual duty of care in the contracts between them. Commenting on Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd5050[1986] AC 80. (discussed in the next section), Lord Goff said that the “temptation of elegance” lay behind the decision and that, even before Tai Hing, t......
  • Third Parties and Bill of Lading Terms
    • United Kingdom
    • Oxford University Press Books and Journals Carriage of Goods by Sea (Third Edition) Part II
    • Invalid date
    ...above, para 8.46. 78 See particularly Henderson v Merrett Syndicates Ltd [1995] 2 AC 145 (HL), 194. But cf Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1986] AC 80 (PC), 79 See Simaan General Contracting Co v Pilkington Glass Ltd (No 2) [1988] QB 758 (CA), 782. 80 Law Commission Repo......
  • Chapter 11: The Relationship of Banker and Customer
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Bills of Exchange and Bankers' Documentary Credits Cheques
    • Invalid date
    ...has been upheld often: see Kepitigalla Rubber Estates Ltd v. National Bank of India Ltd [1909] 2 KB 1010; Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v. Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1985] 2 All ER 947. Per Lord Scarman in Tai Hing Cotton Mill Ltd v. Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1985] 2 All ER 947 at p. 959d–f. 53 Lib......
  • Chapter 10. Negligence
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Construction Law, Volume II. Second Edition
    • Invalid date
    ...per Judge Newey QC. 545 William Hill Organisation Ltd v Bernard Sunley & Sons Ltd (1982) 22 BLR 1 at 29–30; Tai Hing Ltd v Liu Chong Hing Bank Ltd [1986] AC 80 at 107 (PC); Banque Keyser Ullmann SA v Skandia Insurance Co Ltd [1990] 1 QB 665 at 800 (CA); Conway v Crowe Kelsey & Partn......
  • Get Started for Free