Tamplin (F. A.) Steamship Company v Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Company
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Year | 1916 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1916 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
90 cases
-
Denny, Mott & Dickson Ltd v Jas. B. Fraser & Company
...the trading agreement. If so, it only remains to consider whether, in the words of Lord Loreburn in F.A. Tamplin Steamship Company Limited v. Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Company Limited, (1916) 2 A.C. 397, at p. 403, the discontinuance of the trading agreement admittedly caused in the......
-
Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council
..."never agreed to be bound". 26 Much to the same effect was a passage in the speech of Lord Loreburn in F.A. Tamplin Steamship Co. Ltd. v. Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Co. Ltd., 1916, 2 Appeal Cases, page 397, at page 403: "But a Court can and ought to examine the contract and the circum......
-
Harvester Baptist Church Ltd v Chua Moh Huat Dennis
...relevant surrounding circumstances when the contract was made.In FA Tamplin Steamship Co Ltd v Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Co Ltd [1916] 2 AC 397 Lord Loreburn said at pp 403-404: A court can and ought to examine the contract and the circumstances in which it was made, not of course to......
-
Planet Kids Ltd v Auckland Council
...benefits conferred under contracts that have been frustrated after partial performance. 39 See, for example, FA Tamplin Steamship Co Ltd v Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Co Ltd [1916] 2 AC 397 (HL) at 403–404 per Earl Loreburn. 40 This explanation is commonly used in the United States: E......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Frustration
...with 17 Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council , [1956] AC 696 at 728 (HL), Lord Radcliffe [ Davis Contractors ]. 18 [1916] 2 AC 397 (HL) [ Tamplin Steamship ]. 19 Ibid at 406–7. 20 Ibid at 407. THE LAW OF CONTR ACTS 660 the special exception which justice demands.” 21 Thus,......
-
Frustration
...the special excep- 17 Davis Contractors Ltd . v. Fareham Urban District Council , [1956] A.C. 696 at 728 (H.L.), Lord Radcliffe. 18 [1916] 2 A.C. 397 (H.L.). 19 Ibid . at 406–7. 20 Ibid . at 407. Frustration 571 tion which justice demands.” 21 Thus, some judges characterized the doctrine as......