Tapscott v Balfour
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 23 November 1872 |
| Date | 23 November 1872 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Agostino Bertani, Cape Rodney, Queen City, Riverton)
...the charterers the right to fix the place where the carrying voyage is to end? Even without authority I should say that it did, but Tapscott v. Balfour, Law Reports 8 Common Pleas, page 46, has dealt with a charterparty in a similar form, where a particular dock has to be named, the necessa......
-
Mediterranean Salvage & Towage Ltd v Seamar Trading & Commerce Inc. [QBD (Comm)]
...per Sir Robert Phillimore. The precise basis on which the master must obey will depend on the exact terms of the charterparty. 6 Tapscott v Balfour (1872) LR 8 CP 46 at 52; Tharsis Sulphur and Copper Company Limited v Morel Brothers & Co [1891] 2QB 647 at 650; Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Mi......
-
Oldendorff (E. L.) & Company G.m.b.H. v Tradax Export S.A. (Johanna Oldendorff)
...load, and as near as circumstances permit to the actual loading 'spot'. I use the convenient word which was employed by Denman J. in Tapscott v. Balfour and by "Bramwell L.J. in Davies v. McVeagh, be it quay or wharf, or pier, or mooring, and in a place where ships waiting for access to tha......
-
United States Shipping Board v Frank C. Strick & Company, Ltd
...of the vessel. All this is clearly established by a series of authorities which cannot now be shaken, including ( Tapscott v. Balfour 1872, L.R. 8 C.P. 46), ( Thiis v. Byers 1876, L.R. 1 Q.B.D. 244), ( Nelson v. Dahl 1879, L.R. 12 Ch.D. 568), ( Pyman v. Dreyfus 1889, L.R. 24 Q.B.D. 152), ( ......
Request a trial to view additional results