Targett v Torfaen Borough Council
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1992 |
| Date | 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Drysdale v Hedges
...insufficiently strong glass in a glass panel which caused the tenant injury. Rimmer was followed by the Court of Appeal in Targett v Torfaen Borough Council [1992] 3 All ER. More recently in Boldack v East Lindsay District Council 31 HLR 41 May LJ held that Cavalier v Pope was binding autho......
-
Pearson Education Ltd v The Charter Partnership Ltd
...it is reasonable for the claimant not to remove the danger posed by the defect and to run the risk of injury: see Targett v Torfaen BC [1992] 3 All ER 27 per Sir Donald Nicholls V-C at page 37.” 30 The material facts in Baxall can be summarised as follows: i) The claimants could 'reasonabl......
-
Baxall Securities Ltd v Sheard Walshaw Partnership
...it is reasonable for the claimant not to remove the danger posed by the defect and to run the risk of injury: see Targett v Torfaen BC [1992] 3 All ER 27 per Sir Donald Nicholls V-C at p.37. Liability for the second flood 55 It follows that the judge was right to find that that there was n......
-
Baxall Securities Ltd and Another v Sheard Walshaw Partnership (A Firm)
...the defect yet continues to occupy the building." 100 The last sentence was qualified by the Court of Appeal in Targett v.Torfaen B.C. [1992] 3 All ER 27 (following Rimmer v. Liverpool City Council [1984] 1 All ER 930) where it was pointed out that in some cases, (for example a person of li......
Request a trial to view additional results