Tart v G. W. Chitty & Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1933
Year1933
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
31 cases
  • MA Clyde v Wong Ah Mei and Another
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Gailius Mathurin Joachim Mathurin Claimants v Andrew Paul Defendant [ECSC]
    • St Lucia
    • High Court (Saint Lucia)
    • 13 Julio 2004
    ...WHEN DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE COLLIDED WITH HIM AND HIS VEHICLE…WHO IS LIABLE…WAS THERE NEGLIGENCE ON THE PART OF DEFENDANT…CASE OF TART v G.W. CHITTY [1933] 2 K.B. 453 APPLIED… CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE……DAMAGES FOR PERSONAL INJURIES…CASES OF ALPHONSE v RAMNAUTH AND FENTON AUGUSTE v FRANCISNEP......
  • Darel Christopher v Benedicta Samuels dba Samuels Richardson & Company
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 18 Marzo 2010
    ...of Lords from Scotland. 16. Nance v British Columbia Electric Railway Company (1951) A.C. 601. 17. Tart v G.W. Chitty and Company Limited [1933] 2 KB 453. 18. Page v Richards & Draper referred to in Tart v G.W. Chitty and Company Limited 19. Perestrello E Compania v United Pain Co Ltd (1969......
  • Abdul Latif bin Ismail; Lim Kar Bee
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free