Tate Access Floors Inc. and Another v Boswell and Others
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 13 June 1990 |
| Date | 13 June 1990 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
99 cases
-
C Corporation v P
...Swiss Bank & Trust Corp. Ltd. v. Iorgulescu, 1994–95 CILR 149, dictum of Georges J.A. applied. (17) Tate Access Floors Inc. v. Boswell, [1991] Ch. 512; [1990] 3 All E.R. 303, distinguished. Legislation construed: Grand Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, r.26: The relevant terms of this rule are......
-
Bishopsgate Investment Management Ltd v Maxwell; Cooper v Maxwell; Mirror Group Newspapers Plc v Maxwell
...plaintiffs in equity. A similar submission was rejected by Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson V.-C., sitting at first instance, in Tate Access Floors Inc. v. Boswell [1991] Ch. 512 at 528, which is for present purposes indistinguishable from the present case. Hoffmann J., again correctly in the ......
-
Poon Kng Siang and Another v Tan Ah Keng and Others
...... the above, my readings have led me to the case of Tate Access Floors Inc v Boswell ,4 where the learned ......
-
Select Holdings Ltd v Petroleum Coporation of Jamaica Ltd
...and H.L. at 807." 51The other citation is at page 134 and reads at footnote 62: "note also tiie dictum of Browne-Wilkinson V.C. in Tate Access Inc. v. Boswell [1991] Ch. 512 'If people choose to conduct their affairs through the medium of corporation, they are taking advantage of the fact t......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Ex Parte Relief And Full And Frank Disclosure
...an interlocutory basis pending the ultimate trial. Endnotes 1 McDonagh v Ulster Bank Ireland Limited [2014] IEH 476. 2 [2005] IEHC 43. 3 [1991] Ch 512, at p. 4 [1871] IR 6 EQ 79. 5 Relying on Bambrick v Cobley [2005] IEHC 43 and Lloyds Bowmaker Limited v Brittania Arrow Holdings Ltd [1988] ......
4 books & journal articles
-
Defining the Limits of the Common-Law, South African and European Privilege against Self-Incrimination
...the cou rt”); and (iii) such a wid e extension of the priv ilege will rarely be i nvoked in practice46 Tate Access Floors Inc v B oswell [1991] Ch 512 (HC)47 R v Minihane (1921) 16 Cr App R 3848 [1983] QB 25 Se e also Rio Tinto Zinc Corp v Westinghouse Electrical Corp [1978] AC 547 637 Note......
-
THE PRIVILEGE AGAINST SELF‐INCRIMINATION
...Management v Maxwell,[1992] 2 WLR 991. 5 Rank Film Distribution v Video Informa-tion Centre[1982] AC 380 (HL). 6 Tale Access v Boswell[1991] Ch 512; Sociedade National v Lundquist[1991] 2 QB 310. 7 Bhimji v Chalwani 31st July, 1991 per Knox J, now reported at[1992] 1 WLR 1158. In the same c......
-
CONTROL OF THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE ORDER†
...to a real and appreciable risk of self-incrimination: Hung Ka Ho v A-1 Office System Pte Ltd[1992] 2 SLR 379. 42 [1992] 2 SLR 273. 43 [1991] 2 WLR 304. 44 supra, at p. 317. 45 [1993] 1 SLR 512. See also M. Hor, “The Privilege Against Self-incrimination And Fairness To The Accused”[1993] SJL......
-
THE ANTON PILLER ORDER 2 DECADES LATER: THE BALANCING ACT GOES ON
...and Anton Piller order” at page 55. 8 Ibid. 9 Bayer AG v Winter (No. 1) [1986] 1 WLR 497, CA. 10 see Tate Access Floors Inc v Boswell[1991] Ch 512 per Sir Nicholas Browne-Wilkinson VC at 530E. 11 n. 1 at page 61. 12 n. 1 at page 61. 13 per Scott J in Columbia Picture[1987] Ch. 38 at page 71......