Tate v Latham & Son
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1897 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Metcalf v Great Boulder Pty Gold Mines Ltd
-
Nimmo (James) & Company v Connell
...to be, a way with a well in it covered by a lid, and there was nothing wrong with the lid �" 52 In ( Tate v. Latham and Son 1897, 1 Q.B.D., page 502) a saw worked by machinery had a guard to it which the man in charge of the saw removed in the course of an afternoon because he thought tha......
-
Robertson v kinneil Cannel and Coking Coal Company
...Lord Phillimore at p. 94, [1924] A. C. 595 at pp. 602, 609, 610; Smith v. Baker & SonsELR, [1891] A. C. 325; Tate v. Latham & SonELR, [1897] 1 Q. B. 502, Bruce, J., at p. 5 Connell v. James Nimmo & Co.ELR, 1924 S. C. (H. L.) 84, Lord Atkinson at p. 90, [1924] A. C. 595, at p. 604; Tate v. L......
-
Robertson v kinneil Cannel and Coking Coal Company
...2 Connell v. James Nimmo & Co.ELR, 1924 S. C. (H. L.) 84, Lord Atkinson at p. 89, [1924] A. C. 595, at p. 602; Tate v. Latham & SonELR, [1897] 1 Q. B. 502, Bruce J,. at p. 506. Lord Esher, M.R., at p. 3 Reference was also made to Lawrie v. Banknock Coal Co.ELR, 1912 S. C. (H. L.) 20, [1912]......